Mutational Hotspot Detection in LGL Leukemia

Nikki Aaron, Prabhjot Singh, Siddharth Surapaneni, Joseph Wysocki
{"title":"Mutational Hotspot Detection in LGL Leukemia","authors":"Nikki Aaron, Prabhjot Singh, Siddharth Surapaneni, Joseph Wysocki","doi":"10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483797","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cancer genomics has been focused primarily on identifying and studying mutations that are over-represented in known genes. This project applied methods to scan through entire chromosomes and label these loci as \"genomic probabilistic hotspots\" (GPHs). A GPH is defined as any area on a patient’s chromosome where the observed rate of mutations over positions of a given chromosome window far exceeds what would be expected from random variation. The approach is then applied to 39 patients diagnosed with large granular lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia - a rare form of blood cancer. In order to calculate expected mutation rates in non-LGL patients, data were obtained from the 1000 Genome Project. A negative binomial test was employed to isolate specific GPHs where the distribution of mutations within the LGL patient sample was significantly high. The Negative Binomial approach identified a median of 1 to 2 patient hotspots per chromosome with a mean Jaccard’s distance between patients being 0.90. The KDE method found a median of 40 hotspots with wider span resulting in a mean Jaccard’s distance of 0.43. The results from the Negative Binomial approach indicated heterogeneity between hotspot locations, whereas KDE results were more homogeneous. Negative binomial is best for pinpointing the most significantly dense regions, whereas KDE is best for identifying all broad regions that are more mutated than a reference. These new, gene-agnostic approaches provide novel methods to search chromosomes for mutational abnormalities and can be generalized and scaled to any clinical syndrome. Future directions include extension of the GPH method across genomes, developing a robust library of disease- and/or model species-specific hotspot profiles. These may serve as reference guides in studies seeking to understand the exact biochemical processes driving the onset and progression of rare cancers.","PeriodicalId":426747,"journal":{"name":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS52267.2021.9483797","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cancer genomics has been focused primarily on identifying and studying mutations that are over-represented in known genes. This project applied methods to scan through entire chromosomes and label these loci as "genomic probabilistic hotspots" (GPHs). A GPH is defined as any area on a patient’s chromosome where the observed rate of mutations over positions of a given chromosome window far exceeds what would be expected from random variation. The approach is then applied to 39 patients diagnosed with large granular lymphocyte (LGL) leukemia - a rare form of blood cancer. In order to calculate expected mutation rates in non-LGL patients, data were obtained from the 1000 Genome Project. A negative binomial test was employed to isolate specific GPHs where the distribution of mutations within the LGL patient sample was significantly high. The Negative Binomial approach identified a median of 1 to 2 patient hotspots per chromosome with a mean Jaccard’s distance between patients being 0.90. The KDE method found a median of 40 hotspots with wider span resulting in a mean Jaccard’s distance of 0.43. The results from the Negative Binomial approach indicated heterogeneity between hotspot locations, whereas KDE results were more homogeneous. Negative binomial is best for pinpointing the most significantly dense regions, whereas KDE is best for identifying all broad regions that are more mutated than a reference. These new, gene-agnostic approaches provide novel methods to search chromosomes for mutational abnormalities and can be generalized and scaled to any clinical syndrome. Future directions include extension of the GPH method across genomes, developing a robust library of disease- and/or model species-specific hotspot profiles. These may serve as reference guides in studies seeking to understand the exact biochemical processes driving the onset and progression of rare cancers.
LGL白血病的突变热点检测
癌症基因组学主要集中在识别和研究在已知基因中过度代表的突变。该项目采用扫描整个染色体的方法,并将这些位点标记为“基因组概率热点”(GPHs)。GPH被定义为患者染色体上的任何区域,在给定的染色体窗口位置上观察到的突变率远远超过随机变异的预期。然后将这种方法应用于39名被诊断为大颗粒淋巴细胞白血病(LGL)的患者——一种罕见的血癌。为了计算非lgl患者的预期突变率,数据来自1000基因组计划。采用负二项检验来分离LGL患者样本中突变分布显著高的特定GPHs。负二项法确定每条染色体中位数为1至2个患者热点,患者之间的平均Jaccard距离为0.90。KDE方法发现40个热点的中位数具有更大的跨度,导致平均Jaccard距离为0.43。负二项方法的结果表明热点地区之间存在异质性,而KDE方法的结果更为均匀。负二项式最适合精确定位最显著的密集区域,而KDE最适合识别比参考更容易变异的所有广泛区域。这些新的、基因不可知的方法提供了寻找染色体突变异常的新方法,可以推广和扩展到任何临床综合征。未来的方向包括将GPH方法扩展到整个基因组,开发一个强大的疾病和/或模型物种特异性热点图谱库。这些可以作为研究的参考指南,以寻求了解驱动罕见癌症发生和发展的确切生化过程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信