Comparative Analysis of TCP, TCP-Vegas, and SCTP in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks

Fahad Hussain Mirani, Pardeep Kumar, M. S. Memon, M. N. Bhatti, Wanod Kumar
{"title":"Comparative Analysis of TCP, TCP-Vegas, and SCTP in Mobile Ad-Hoc Networks","authors":"Fahad Hussain Mirani, Pardeep Kumar, M. S. Memon, M. N. Bhatti, Wanod Kumar","doi":"10.31645/jisrc.22.20.2.7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) are a collection of mobiles and smart devices that communicate using wireless links. These types of networks are growing at the best speed and being used at a large scale than before ever because of their high availability and mobility. As the usage scale of MANET devices has been increasing, the challenges have also increased for example the proper delivery of data or information to every mobile node. Traditionally, transmission control protocol(TCP) is used for delivery but it does not fit in all scenarios due to some of its limitations such as network congestion and quick recovery in case of link failure. In this, a comparative analysis of TCP is performed with the stream control transmission protocol (SCTP) and a TCP variant called TCP VEGAS. A number of ad hoc Scenarios are proposed with varying numbers of mobile nodes,i.e 11,21, and 31. The results obtained indicate that SCTP outperforms TCP and VEGAS in throughput. The packet lifetime while using SCTP is also small i.e 0.19 seconds. The link utilization of SCTP is better than TCP and VEGAS. However, TCP increases its link utilization than VEGAS for the nodes in MANET of large delay.","PeriodicalId":412730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Independent Studies and Research Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31645/jisrc.22.20.2.7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mobile Ad hoc Networks (MANET) are a collection of mobiles and smart devices that communicate using wireless links. These types of networks are growing at the best speed and being used at a large scale than before ever because of their high availability and mobility. As the usage scale of MANET devices has been increasing, the challenges have also increased for example the proper delivery of data or information to every mobile node. Traditionally, transmission control protocol(TCP) is used for delivery but it does not fit in all scenarios due to some of its limitations such as network congestion and quick recovery in case of link failure. In this, a comparative analysis of TCP is performed with the stream control transmission protocol (SCTP) and a TCP variant called TCP VEGAS. A number of ad hoc Scenarios are proposed with varying numbers of mobile nodes,i.e 11,21, and 31. The results obtained indicate that SCTP outperforms TCP and VEGAS in throughput. The packet lifetime while using SCTP is also small i.e 0.19 seconds. The link utilization of SCTP is better than TCP and VEGAS. However, TCP increases its link utilization than VEGAS for the nodes in MANET of large delay.
移动Ad-Hoc网络中TCP、TCP- vegas和SCTP的比较分析
移动自组织网络(MANET)是使用无线链路进行通信的移动设备和智能设备的集合。由于其高可用性和移动性,这些类型的网络正以最快的速度增长,并且比以往任何时候都被大规模使用。随着MANET设备使用规模的不断扩大,向每个移动节点正确传输数据或信息等挑战也在增加。传统上,传输控制协议(TCP)用于传输,但由于网络拥塞和链路故障快速恢复等限制,TCP协议并不是适用于所有场景。在本文中,对TCP进行了流控制传输协议(SCTP)和称为TCP VEGAS的TCP变体的比较分析。提出了许多具有不同数量的移动节点的特殊场景,例如。e11 21和31。结果表明,SCTP在吞吐量上优于TCP和VEGAS。使用SCTP时数据包的生存时间也很短,即0.19秒。SCTP的链路利用率高于TCP和VEGAS。然而,对于大延迟的MANET节点,TCP的链路利用率比VEGAS高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信