A control flow graph-based signature for packer identification

Moustafa Saleh, E. Ratazzi, Shouhuai Xu
{"title":"A control flow graph-based signature for packer identification","authors":"Moustafa Saleh, E. Ratazzi, Shouhuai Xu","doi":"10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The large number of malicious files that are produced daily outpaces the current capacity of malware analysis and detection. For example, Intel Security Labs reported that during the second quarter of 2016, their system found more than 40M of new malware [1]. The damage of malware attacks is also increasingly devastating, as witnessed by the recent Cryptowall malware that has reportedly generated more than $325M in ransom payments to its perpetrators [2]. In terms of defense, it has been widely accepted that the traditional approach based on byte-string signatures is increasingly ineffective, especially for new malware samples and sophisticated variants of existing ones. New techniques are therefore needed for effective defense against malware. Motivated by this problem, the paper investigates a new defense technique against malware. The technique presented in this paper is utilized for automatic identification of malware packers that are used to obfuscate malware programs. Signatures of malware packers and obfuscators are extracted from the CFGs of malware samples. Unlike conventional byte signatures that can be evaded by simply modifying one or multiple bytes in malware samples, these signatures are more difficult to evade. For example, CFG-based signatures are shown to be resilient against instruction modifications and shuffling, as a single signature is sufficient for detecting mildly different versions of the same malware. Last but not least, the process for extracting CFG-based signatures is also made automatic.","PeriodicalId":113767,"journal":{"name":"MILCOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM)","volume":"136 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MILCOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Military Communications Conference (MILCOM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MILCOM.2017.8170793","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The large number of malicious files that are produced daily outpaces the current capacity of malware analysis and detection. For example, Intel Security Labs reported that during the second quarter of 2016, their system found more than 40M of new malware [1]. The damage of malware attacks is also increasingly devastating, as witnessed by the recent Cryptowall malware that has reportedly generated more than $325M in ransom payments to its perpetrators [2]. In terms of defense, it has been widely accepted that the traditional approach based on byte-string signatures is increasingly ineffective, especially for new malware samples and sophisticated variants of existing ones. New techniques are therefore needed for effective defense against malware. Motivated by this problem, the paper investigates a new defense technique against malware. The technique presented in this paper is utilized for automatic identification of malware packers that are used to obfuscate malware programs. Signatures of malware packers and obfuscators are extracted from the CFGs of malware samples. Unlike conventional byte signatures that can be evaded by simply modifying one or multiple bytes in malware samples, these signatures are more difficult to evade. For example, CFG-based signatures are shown to be resilient against instruction modifications and shuffling, as a single signature is sufficient for detecting mildly different versions of the same malware. Last but not least, the process for extracting CFG-based signatures is also made automatic.
基于控制流图的封隔器识别签名
每天产生的大量恶意文件超过了当前恶意软件分析和检测的能力。例如,英特尔安全实验室报告称,在2016年第二季度,他们的系统发现了超过4000万个新的恶意软件[1]。恶意软件攻击的破坏也越来越具有破坏性,正如最近的Cryptowall恶意软件所见证的那样,据报道,它已经向其肇事者支付了超过3.25亿美元的赎金[2]。在防御方面,人们普遍认为基于字节串签名的传统方法越来越无效,特别是对于新的恶意软件样本和现有恶意软件的复杂变体。因此,需要新的技术来有效防御恶意软件。针对这一问题,本文研究了一种新的恶意软件防御技术。本文提出的技术用于自动识别用于混淆恶意软件程序的恶意软件封装程序。从恶意软件样本的cfg中提取恶意软件封装器和混淆器的签名。传统的字节签名可以通过简单地修改恶意软件样本中的一个或多个字节来逃避,而这些签名更难以逃避。例如,基于cfg的签名对指令修改和变换具有弹性,因为单个签名足以检测同一恶意软件的轻微不同版本。最后但并非最不重要的是,提取基于cfg的签名的过程也是自动的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信