An instant before the world is born or How to survive in the realm of shadows

A. Sukhno, V. Gulin
{"title":"An instant before the world is born or How to survive in the realm of shadows","authors":"A. Sukhno, V. Gulin","doi":"10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is related to the revealing of the intent of Hegel’s “Science of Logic”. As authors take it, there is an attempt to imagine the fundamental level of reasoning, where there is no opposition between cognition and its object. In this dimension there is no need to substantiate compatibility between them — it is a level of primary foundation of knowledge. Consequently, any knowledge at this level may be characterized as “Ultimate”. That being said, place of such knowledge is not taken by several specific statements, but by the certain way of organizing those “mental definitions” that are already used by common human sense. To organize these definitions, to arrange them into consistently deployed sequence of logical notions, there is need to abort the search for the primary foundation for knowledge inherent in philosophy from its very origins. This attempt was reflected in Kant's theory of knowledge, where the problem of the reliability of knowledge was solved due to self-limitation in the process of cognition — it was necessary to stop before a certain line, beyond which thought leaves “the limits of possible experience” and falls into the area of insoluble contradictions (antinomies). Hegel's Logic, which, according to the authors, is in a kind of “symbiosis” with the Kantian program, consists in considering these insoluble contradictions precisely as a “symptom” of achieving the primary foundation of knowledge. It is in the collision with an insoluble contradiction that the definitions are organized in the necessary logical sequence, and that fundamental level is reached where there is no opposition between cognition and its object.","PeriodicalId":328399,"journal":{"name":"Vox. Philosophical journal","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vox. Philosophical journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37769/2077-6608-2022-36-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article is related to the revealing of the intent of Hegel’s “Science of Logic”. As authors take it, there is an attempt to imagine the fundamental level of reasoning, where there is no opposition between cognition and its object. In this dimension there is no need to substantiate compatibility between them — it is a level of primary foundation of knowledge. Consequently, any knowledge at this level may be characterized as “Ultimate”. That being said, place of such knowledge is not taken by several specific statements, but by the certain way of organizing those “mental definitions” that are already used by common human sense. To organize these definitions, to arrange them into consistently deployed sequence of logical notions, there is need to abort the search for the primary foundation for knowledge inherent in philosophy from its very origins. This attempt was reflected in Kant's theory of knowledge, where the problem of the reliability of knowledge was solved due to self-limitation in the process of cognition — it was necessary to stop before a certain line, beyond which thought leaves “the limits of possible experience” and falls into the area of insoluble contradictions (antinomies). Hegel's Logic, which, according to the authors, is in a kind of “symbiosis” with the Kantian program, consists in considering these insoluble contradictions precisely as a “symptom” of achieving the primary foundation of knowledge. It is in the collision with an insoluble contradiction that the definitions are organized in the necessary logical sequence, and that fundamental level is reached where there is no opposition between cognition and its object.
在世界诞生之前的瞬间或者如何在阴影中生存
本文是关于黑格尔《逻辑学》的意旨的揭示。正如作者们所认为的那样,这是一种设想推理的基本层次的尝试,在这个层次上,认知与其客体之间没有对立。在这个维度中,没有必要证实它们之间的兼容性——这是知识的初级基础水平。因此,在这个层次上的任何知识都可以被描述为“终极”。话虽如此,这种知识的地位并不是由几个特定的陈述所取代的,而是由那些已经被人类常识所使用的“心理定义”的某种组织方式所取代的。要把这些定义组织起来,把它们排列成连贯的逻辑概念序列,就必须放弃从哲学的起源开始寻找哲学固有知识的主要基础。这一尝试体现在康德的认识论中,在认识论中,知识的可靠性问题是由于认识过程中的自我限制而得到解决的——必须在某一界限之前停止,超出这一界限,思维就离开了“可能经验的界限”,陷入了不可解决的矛盾(二律背反)的领域。黑格尔的逻辑学,在作者看来,与康德的纲领是一种“共生关系”,它正是把这些不可解决的矛盾看作是达到知识的最初基础的“征兆”。正是在与不可解决的矛盾的碰撞中,定义才按照必要的逻辑次序组织起来,从而达到认识与对象之间没有对立的基本境界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信