Identify the Most Prominent Contemporary Atheistic Suspicions that Should Be Included in The Monotheism Curricula of Secondary Stage

Awad Al-Kahtany
{"title":"Identify the Most Prominent Contemporary Atheistic Suspicions that Should Be Included in The Monotheism Curricula of Secondary Stage","authors":"Awad Al-Kahtany","doi":"10.54940/ep88532903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aimed to identify the most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions that should be included in the monotheism curricula of secondary stage, the degree to which they contain, and whether there are differences between the curriculums in their inclusion of those suspicions. To achieve the objectives of the study, content analysis was used, which is an approach of the descriptive method. The study tool was a content analysis card that included (15) contemporary atheistic suspicions. After confirming the validity and reliability of the tool, it was used to analyses the monotheism curricula of secondary stage (Ministry of Education edition 1443 / 2021). The study results illustrate that the monotheistic curriculum (1) for the secondary stage (course system) included the most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions by (33.45%) and (96) frequencies. The monotheistic curriculum (2) for the secondary stage (course system) included the most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions by (4.56) and (12) frequencies. the monotheistic curriculum (1) percentage of including most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions was higher than the percentage of its inclusion in the monotheism curriculum (2). Based on the results of the study, it recommended that those who responsible for building and developing monotheism curricula for the secondary stage should refer to research, studies, and publications in contemporary atheism and benefit from them in reviewing and developing these curricula. It suggested that monotheism curricula of undergraduate students should be analyzed in the light of contemporary atheistic suspicions.","PeriodicalId":402392,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Umm Al-Qura University for Educational and Psychological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54940/ep88532903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aimed to identify the most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions that should be included in the monotheism curricula of secondary stage, the degree to which they contain, and whether there are differences between the curriculums in their inclusion of those suspicions. To achieve the objectives of the study, content analysis was used, which is an approach of the descriptive method. The study tool was a content analysis card that included (15) contemporary atheistic suspicions. After confirming the validity and reliability of the tool, it was used to analyses the monotheism curricula of secondary stage (Ministry of Education edition 1443 / 2021). The study results illustrate that the monotheistic curriculum (1) for the secondary stage (course system) included the most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions by (33.45%) and (96) frequencies. The monotheistic curriculum (2) for the secondary stage (course system) included the most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions by (4.56) and (12) frequencies. the monotheistic curriculum (1) percentage of including most prominent contemporary atheistic suspicions was higher than the percentage of its inclusion in the monotheism curriculum (2). Based on the results of the study, it recommended that those who responsible for building and developing monotheism curricula for the secondary stage should refer to research, studies, and publications in contemporary atheism and benefit from them in reviewing and developing these curricula. It suggested that monotheism curricula of undergraduate students should be analyzed in the light of contemporary atheistic suspicions.
确定应纳入中学一神教课程的当代最突出的无神论怀疑
本研究旨在确定应纳入中学一神教课程的最突出的当代无神论怀疑,它们包含的程度,以及课程之间是否存在差异,包括这些怀疑。为了达到研究的目的,使用了内容分析,这是一种描述性方法。研究工具是一个内容分析卡,其中包括(15)当代无神论的怀疑。在确认该工具的有效性和可靠性后,将其用于分析中学阶段的一神教课程(教育部版1443 / 2021)。研究结果表明,中学阶段(课程体系)的一神论课程(1)包含了最突出的当代无神论怀疑(33.45%)和(96)个频率。第二阶段(课程体系)的一神论课程(2)包含了最突出的当代无神论怀疑(4.56)和(12)的频率。一神论课程(1)包含最突出的当代无神论怀疑的百分比高于一神论课程(2)的百分比。根据研究结果,它建议那些负责建立和发展第二阶段一神论课程的人应该参考当代无神论的研究、研究和出版物,并在审查和发展这些课程时从中受益。建议在当代无神论质疑的背景下,对大学生的一神教课程进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信