Alibi Routing

Dave Levin, Youndo Lee, Luke Valenta, Zhihao Li, Victoria Lai, C. Lumezanu, N. Spring, Bobby Bhattacharjee
{"title":"Alibi Routing","authors":"Dave Levin, Youndo Lee, Luke Valenta, Zhihao Li, Victoria Lai, C. Lumezanu, N. Spring, Bobby Bhattacharjee","doi":"10.1145/2785956.2787509","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There are several mechanisms by which users can gain insight into where their packets have gone, but no mechanisms allow users undeniable proof that their packets did not traverse certain parts of the world while on their way to or from another host. This paper introduces the problem of finding \"proofs of avoidance\": evidence that the paths taken by a packet and its response avoided a user-specified set of \"forbidden\" geographic regions. Proving that something did not happen is often intractable, but we demonstrate a low-overhead proof structure built around the idea of what we call \"alibis\": relays with particular timing constraints that, when upheld, would make it impossible to traverse both the relay and the forbidden regions. We present Alibi Routing, a peer-to-peer overlay routing system for finding alibis securely and efficiently. One of the primary distinguishing characteristics of Alibi Routing is that it does not require knowledge of--or modifications to--the Internet's routing hardware or policies. Rather, Alibi Routing is able to derive its proofs of avoidance from user-provided GPS coordinates and speed of light propagation delays. Using a PlanetLab deployment and larger-scale simulations, we evaluate Alibi Routing to demonstrate that many source-destination pairs can avoid countries of their choosing with little latency inflation. We also identify when Alibi Routing does not work: it has difficulty avoiding regions that users are very close to (or, of course, inside of).","PeriodicalId":268472,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"49","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2015 ACM Conference on Special Interest Group on Data Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2785956.2787509","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 49

Abstract

There are several mechanisms by which users can gain insight into where their packets have gone, but no mechanisms allow users undeniable proof that their packets did not traverse certain parts of the world while on their way to or from another host. This paper introduces the problem of finding "proofs of avoidance": evidence that the paths taken by a packet and its response avoided a user-specified set of "forbidden" geographic regions. Proving that something did not happen is often intractable, but we demonstrate a low-overhead proof structure built around the idea of what we call "alibis": relays with particular timing constraints that, when upheld, would make it impossible to traverse both the relay and the forbidden regions. We present Alibi Routing, a peer-to-peer overlay routing system for finding alibis securely and efficiently. One of the primary distinguishing characteristics of Alibi Routing is that it does not require knowledge of--or modifications to--the Internet's routing hardware or policies. Rather, Alibi Routing is able to derive its proofs of avoidance from user-provided GPS coordinates and speed of light propagation delays. Using a PlanetLab deployment and larger-scale simulations, we evaluate Alibi Routing to demonstrate that many source-destination pairs can avoid countries of their choosing with little latency inflation. We also identify when Alibi Routing does not work: it has difficulty avoiding regions that users are very close to (or, of course, inside of).
不在场证明路由
有几种机制可以让用户了解他们的数据包去了哪里,但是没有一种机制允许用户不可否认地证明他们的数据包在往返另一个主机的途中没有经过世界的某些地方。本文介绍了寻找“回避证明”的问题:证明数据包及其响应所采取的路径避开了用户指定的一组“禁止的”地理区域。证明某些事情没有发生通常是棘手的,但我们展示了一个低开销的证明结构,该结构围绕着我们所谓的“不在场证明”的想法:具有特定时间限制的继电器,当它被支持时,将使继电器和禁止区域无法同时穿越。我们提出了一种安全有效地寻找不在场证明的点对点覆盖路由系统。Alibi Routing的主要特征之一是,它不需要了解或修改互联网的路由硬件或策略。相反,Alibi Routing能够从用户提供的GPS坐标和光传播延迟的速度中推导出它的回避证明。使用PlanetLab部署和更大规模的模拟,我们评估了Alibi路由,以证明许多源-目的地对可以避免他们选择的国家,并且延迟膨胀很小。我们还可以确定什么时候Alibi Routing不起作用:它很难避开用户非常接近的区域(或者,当然,在内部)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信