Omnibus Law dalam Konstitusi Indonesia

Kania Venisa Rachim, Christo Sumurung Tua Sagala, Eddy Mulyono
{"title":"Omnibus Law dalam Konstitusi Indonesia","authors":"Kania Venisa Rachim, Christo Sumurung Tua Sagala, Eddy Mulyono","doi":"10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Omnibus Law is often discussed and debated, especially in its implementation in Indonesia. Omnibus Law is considered as a solution to make legislation more efficient, Omnibus Law is something new in the formation of legislation in Indonesia. Previously, the Omnibus Law was often used in the common law legal system, and several civil law countries have also implemented the Omnibus Law. In this study, the authors examine the United States and the Philippines. The concept of the Omnibus Law is not only used for one type of law but has penetrated into other sectoral laws. In the Philippines, since 2003 the Omnibus Law has been enacted as a method for forming legislation. It is different from the United States, which has implemented the Omnibus Law since 1850. This research refers to a comparison of the Omnibus Law in the Philippines because the Philippines is a country in the Southeast Asia region just like Indonesia and adheres to a legal system that combines common law and civil law which does not very different from Indonesia, further comparison with the United States Omnibus Law, because the United States is also one of the countries that is the mecca of world law. This study uses normative legal research, using secondary data which is processed using qualitative techniques. This study uses a comparison of two countries which makes this research different from other research related to the Omnibus Law, with the aim of examining the position of the Omnibus Law in Indonesia and making comparisons with the United States and the Philippines.","PeriodicalId":395461,"journal":{"name":"Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ajudikasi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30656/ajudikasi.v7i1.6485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Omnibus Law is often discussed and debated, especially in its implementation in Indonesia. Omnibus Law is considered as a solution to make legislation more efficient, Omnibus Law is something new in the formation of legislation in Indonesia. Previously, the Omnibus Law was often used in the common law legal system, and several civil law countries have also implemented the Omnibus Law. In this study, the authors examine the United States and the Philippines. The concept of the Omnibus Law is not only used for one type of law but has penetrated into other sectoral laws. In the Philippines, since 2003 the Omnibus Law has been enacted as a method for forming legislation. It is different from the United States, which has implemented the Omnibus Law since 1850. This research refers to a comparison of the Omnibus Law in the Philippines because the Philippines is a country in the Southeast Asia region just like Indonesia and adheres to a legal system that combines common law and civil law which does not very different from Indonesia, further comparison with the United States Omnibus Law, because the United States is also one of the countries that is the mecca of world law. This study uses normative legal research, using secondary data which is processed using qualitative techniques. This study uses a comparison of two countries which makes this research different from other research related to the Omnibus Law, with the aim of examining the position of the Omnibus Law in Indonesia and making comparisons with the United States and the Philippines.
《综合法》经常被讨论和辩论,特别是在印度尼西亚实施时。综合法被认为是提高立法效率的一种解决方案,综合法是印尼立法形成过程中的新事物。在此之前,综合法在英美法系中经常被采用,一些大陆法系国家也实行了综合法。在这项研究中,作者考察了美国和菲律宾。综合法的概念不仅用于一类法律,而且已渗透到其他部门的法律中。在菲律宾,自2003年以来颁布了《综合法》,作为形成立法的一种方法。这与美国不同,美国从1850年开始实施《综合法案》。本研究是对菲律宾的综合法进行比较,因为菲律宾和印度尼西亚一样是东南亚地区的国家,实行的是英美法系和大陆法系相结合的法律制度,与印度尼西亚没有太大的区别,进一步与美国的综合法进行比较,因为美国也是世界法律的圣地之一。本研究采用规范的法律研究,使用二手数据,使用定性技术进行处理。本研究使用了两个国家的比较,这使得本研究不同于其他与综合法相关的研究,目的是检查综合法在印度尼西亚的地位,并与美国和菲律宾进行比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信