Social media disinformation and voting decisions during 2019 presidential elections in Nigeria

K. Obono, Karimah Aminu Diyo
{"title":"Social media disinformation and voting decisions during 2019 presidential elections in Nigeria","authors":"K. Obono, Karimah Aminu Diyo","doi":"10.4314/ejotmas.v8i1-2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Social media spread disinformation due to their characteristic features of anonymity and ease of producing, accessing, forwarding, and replicating media contents. Although studies have analyzed the influence of disinformation on voter choices, little is known about the false information that  went viral on social media during the 2019 Nigerian presidential elections and its influence on voting decisions. Accordingly, the study identified  social media disinformation about Muhammadu Buhari (All Progressives Congress) and Atiku Abubakar (Peoples Democratic Party), and its  influence on voting decisions. Content analysis of Twitter, Facebook and YouTube posts revealed 10 viral pieces of disinformation about the  contestants. Although the messages looked authentic because of their attribution, they were tagged false by independent fact checkers and  disclaimers. They were also ascribed as false by survey respondents. Despite their presence, the information had little influence on voting decisions.  While Facebook is the most used social media platform (48.6%), Twitter (60%) is the core channel of political disinformation. Posts used  multiple story formats and information sources to make claims appear real. A combination of text, video, and picture was used for the political  messaging, with pictures accompanying most stories for emphasis and message authentication. Each news story had more than 2000 likes and  shares, which has implications for the continuous spread of false information.","PeriodicalId":333241,"journal":{"name":"EJOTMAS: Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EJOTMAS: Ekpoma Journal of Theatre and Media Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/ejotmas.v8i1-2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Social media spread disinformation due to their characteristic features of anonymity and ease of producing, accessing, forwarding, and replicating media contents. Although studies have analyzed the influence of disinformation on voter choices, little is known about the false information that  went viral on social media during the 2019 Nigerian presidential elections and its influence on voting decisions. Accordingly, the study identified  social media disinformation about Muhammadu Buhari (All Progressives Congress) and Atiku Abubakar (Peoples Democratic Party), and its  influence on voting decisions. Content analysis of Twitter, Facebook and YouTube posts revealed 10 viral pieces of disinformation about the  contestants. Although the messages looked authentic because of their attribution, they were tagged false by independent fact checkers and  disclaimers. They were also ascribed as false by survey respondents. Despite their presence, the information had little influence on voting decisions.  While Facebook is the most used social media platform (48.6%), Twitter (60%) is the core channel of political disinformation. Posts used  multiple story formats and information sources to make claims appear real. A combination of text, video, and picture was used for the political  messaging, with pictures accompanying most stories for emphasis and message authentication. Each news story had more than 2000 likes and  shares, which has implications for the continuous spread of false information.
2019年尼日利亚总统选举期间的社交媒体虚假信息和投票决定
社交媒体以其匿名性和易于制作、访问、转发和复制媒体内容的特点传播虚假信息。尽管有研究分析了虚假信息对选民选择的影响,但人们对2019年尼日利亚总统选举期间在社交媒体上传播的虚假信息及其对投票决定的影响知之甚少。因此,该研究确定了社交媒体上关于穆罕默杜·布哈里(全体进步大会)和阿提库·阿布巴卡尔(人民民主党)的虚假信息,以及它对投票决定的影响。对推特、脸书和YouTube帖子的内容分析揭示了10条关于选手的虚假信息。尽管这些信息因其署名而看起来是真实的,但它们被独立的事实核查员和免责声明者标记为虚假。被调查者也认为是假的。尽管他们在场,但这些信息对投票决定几乎没有影响。虽然Facebook是最常用的社交媒体平台(48.6%),但Twitter(60%)是政治虚假信息的核心渠道。帖子使用了多种故事格式和信息来源,使声称看起来是真实的。政治信息使用了文字、视频和图片的组合,大多数故事都附有图片,以强调和信息验证。每个新闻报道都有超过2000个点赞和分享,这意味着虚假信息的持续传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信