Legal issues in transactions of insurance products through online platforms of Big Tech

Soo-seok Maeng
{"title":"Legal issues in transactions of insurance products through online platforms of Big Tech","authors":"Soo-seok Maeng","doi":"10.36248/kdps.2023.17.1.043","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Business of Big Tech companies in financial area is recently accelerated by such methods as sales and brokerage services of insurance products through online platforms, etc. Digital platform phenomenon next to Pin Tech is expected to play positive functions to enhance competitiveness of financial business by increasing efficiency and capacity of finance, reducing consumers’ searching costs, and expanding options. However, on the other hand, such a phenomenon may cause problems in consumer protection because financial stability is reduced and identification of responsible entities due to complex digital transactions. Especially, as financial business gives large influence to national economy and launch and operation of financial business is strictly regulated in the aspect of public character of financial business, if Big Tech companies launch their business in financial business through cooperation with general financial companies, they may avoid regulation and supervision of financial business and reverse discrimination of existing financial companies may be caused. Therefore, it is required to provide a frame of regulation for transactions of insurance products of Big Tech platform companies. \nA solution to such issues is rational regulation with establishment of the standard on application of Insurance Business Act in relation to operation of insurance business of Big Tech companies. \nWhether an action of a Big Tech company belongs to advertisement of products only or belongs to brokerage or sale of insurance products should be individually and concretely judged and, furthermore, should be judged based on recognition levels of consumers. If advertisement by a Big Tech company is not limited to simple advertisement but actively participates in brokerage including comparison of insurance products and, if consumers trust the Big Tech company and consider such action as brokerage or sale of insurance products, responsibility under Insurance Business Act may be imposed on such company. Also, although it is asserted that the commissions received by a Big Tech company are simple advertisement costs, if brokerage is done through participation of Big Tech at certain level, such action may be considered as brokerage and application of Insurance Business Act is possible. That is, regulations on mediation, brokerage, agency of insurance products under Insurance Business Act should be applied to advertisement of insurance by Big Tech companies depending on level of participation.","PeriodicalId":129340,"journal":{"name":"Korean Insurance Law Association","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Insurance Law Association","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36248/kdps.2023.17.1.043","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Business of Big Tech companies in financial area is recently accelerated by such methods as sales and brokerage services of insurance products through online platforms, etc. Digital platform phenomenon next to Pin Tech is expected to play positive functions to enhance competitiveness of financial business by increasing efficiency and capacity of finance, reducing consumers’ searching costs, and expanding options. However, on the other hand, such a phenomenon may cause problems in consumer protection because financial stability is reduced and identification of responsible entities due to complex digital transactions. Especially, as financial business gives large influence to national economy and launch and operation of financial business is strictly regulated in the aspect of public character of financial business, if Big Tech companies launch their business in financial business through cooperation with general financial companies, they may avoid regulation and supervision of financial business and reverse discrimination of existing financial companies may be caused. Therefore, it is required to provide a frame of regulation for transactions of insurance products of Big Tech platform companies. A solution to such issues is rational regulation with establishment of the standard on application of Insurance Business Act in relation to operation of insurance business of Big Tech companies. Whether an action of a Big Tech company belongs to advertisement of products only or belongs to brokerage or sale of insurance products should be individually and concretely judged and, furthermore, should be judged based on recognition levels of consumers. If advertisement by a Big Tech company is not limited to simple advertisement but actively participates in brokerage including comparison of insurance products and, if consumers trust the Big Tech company and consider such action as brokerage or sale of insurance products, responsibility under Insurance Business Act may be imposed on such company. Also, although it is asserted that the commissions received by a Big Tech company are simple advertisement costs, if brokerage is done through participation of Big Tech at certain level, such action may be considered as brokerage and application of Insurance Business Act is possible. That is, regulations on mediation, brokerage, agency of insurance products under Insurance Business Act should be applied to advertisement of insurance by Big Tech companies depending on level of participation.
大科技在线平台保险产品交易中的法律问题
近年来,科技巨头在金融领域的业务正在加速发展,比如通过网络平台销售和经纪保险产品等。继Pin Tech之后的数字平台现象有望通过提高金融的效率和能力,降低消费者的搜索成本,扩大选择范围,对提高金融业务的竞争力起到积极的作用。然而,另一方面,由于复杂的数字交易导致金融稳定性降低,责任主体的识别,这种现象可能会给消费者保护带来问题。特别是金融业务对国民经济的影响较大,金融业务的开展和运营在金融业务的公共性方面受到严格的监管,如果科技大公司通过与一般金融公司合作开展金融业务,可能会规避对金融业务的监管,造成对现有金融公司的反向歧视。因此,需要为大科技平台公司的保险产品交易提供一个监管框架。解决这些问题的方法是合理监管,建立大型科技公司经营保险业务适用《保险业务法》的标准。大科技公司的行为是属于单纯的产品广告,还是属于经纪、销售保险产品,既要单独具体判断,又要根据消费者的认可程度来判断。如果大型科技公司的广告不限于简单的广告,而是积极参与包括保险产品比较在内的经纪活动,并且如果消费者信任该大型科技公司并将其视为经纪或销售保险产品,则该公司可能会被《保险业务法》规定的责任。此外,虽然声称大科技公司收取的佣金是简单的广告费用,但如果通过大科技公司在一定程度上的参与进行经纪,则可以视为经纪,适用《保险业务法》。也就是说,对于大型科技公司的保险广告,应根据参与程度,适用《保险事业法》中有关保险产品中介、经纪、代理的规定。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信