{"title":"Verification of thermal analysis of PWBs for RAMCAD","authors":"J. Gore, M. Dimarzo, C. Resch, M. Pech","doi":"10.1109/ARMS.1989.49649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Methods involving approximate numerical solutions of the energy equations in two dimensions were developed to allow thermal management and tradeoffs to be conducted efficiently. A validation of the approximate theoretical predictions compared favorably with the experimental data using infrared thermography. Experimental data indicate that infrared thermography provides a method of measuring the temperatures of powered PWBs (printed wiring boards). The overall difference between the measured temperature profile and the calculated temperature profile is within 10%. The discrepancies are thought to be due to uncertainties in material properties and the experimental methods.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":430861,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1989-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings., Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ARMS.1989.49649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Methods involving approximate numerical solutions of the energy equations in two dimensions were developed to allow thermal management and tradeoffs to be conducted efficiently. A validation of the approximate theoretical predictions compared favorably with the experimental data using infrared thermography. Experimental data indicate that infrared thermography provides a method of measuring the temperatures of powered PWBs (printed wiring boards). The overall difference between the measured temperature profile and the calculated temperature profile is within 10%. The discrepancies are thought to be due to uncertainties in material properties and the experimental methods.<>