Produktivitas riset Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Indonesia: Analisis Kualitatif

Nur Kholis, S. Fajaruddin, S. Mutrofin
{"title":"Produktivitas riset Perguruan Tinggi Keagamaan Islam Indonesia: Analisis Kualitatif","authors":"Nur Kholis, S. Fajaruddin, S. Mutrofin","doi":"10.48078/PUBLETTERS.V1I1.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Indonesia's scientific publications in recent years have experienced a significant increase, both at the ASEAN and international levels. However, this achievement has not been evenly distributed, especially in the Islamic Religious Higher Education (PTKI) environment. This paper examines research productivity at PTKI qualitatively through two indicators. First, the quality and quantity of PTKI scientific journals. Second, the writing productivity of the PTKI academic community. Data is collected through various sources; Sinta, Moraref, SCImago, Ministry of Religion's Diktis data and several other secondary sources. The results of the study show, First, the number of PTKI journals ranked Sinta 1 (S1) is 8% or 7 of the total S1 journals. While the PTKI journals ranked Sinta 2 (S2) approximately 19% or 139 of the total journals at the S2 rank. Second, the productivity of writers who are included in the list of 500 productive researchers based on Sinta's data is 10 people from PTKI. In terms of journals and the productivity of researchers in the PTKI scope, the State Islamic Higher Education (PTKIN) and Private Islamic Higher Education (PTKIS) have not been evenly distributed. The results of this study indicate that aspects of equity and collaboration, both between PTKIN and PTKIS as well as PTKI with public universities and other research institutions, are important points in increasing research productivity within the PTKI scope.","PeriodicalId":326591,"journal":{"name":"Publishing Letters","volume":"162 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Publishing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.48078/PUBLETTERS.V1I1.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Indonesia's scientific publications in recent years have experienced a significant increase, both at the ASEAN and international levels. However, this achievement has not been evenly distributed, especially in the Islamic Religious Higher Education (PTKI) environment. This paper examines research productivity at PTKI qualitatively through two indicators. First, the quality and quantity of PTKI scientific journals. Second, the writing productivity of the PTKI academic community. Data is collected through various sources; Sinta, Moraref, SCImago, Ministry of Religion's Diktis data and several other secondary sources. The results of the study show, First, the number of PTKI journals ranked Sinta 1 (S1) is 8% or 7 of the total S1 journals. While the PTKI journals ranked Sinta 2 (S2) approximately 19% or 139 of the total journals at the S2 rank. Second, the productivity of writers who are included in the list of 500 productive researchers based on Sinta's data is 10 people from PTKI. In terms of journals and the productivity of researchers in the PTKI scope, the State Islamic Higher Education (PTKIN) and Private Islamic Higher Education (PTKIS) have not been evenly distributed. The results of this study indicate that aspects of equity and collaboration, both between PTKIN and PTKIS as well as PTKI with public universities and other research institutions, are important points in increasing research productivity within the PTKI scope.
印尼伊斯兰宗教学院研究的生产力:定性分析
近年来,印度尼西亚的科学出版物在东盟和国际一级都有了显著的增长。然而,这一成就的分布并不均匀,特别是在伊斯兰宗教高等教育(PTKI)环境中。本文通过两个指标对PTKI的研究生产力进行了定性检验。一是PTKI科技期刊的质量和数量。二是PTKI学术界的写作生产力。通过各种来源收集数据;Sinta, Moraref, SCImago,宗教部的Diktis数据和其他一些二手资料。研究结果表明:第一,PTKI排名为S1的期刊数量占S1期刊总数的8%,占7种;而PTKI期刊排名Sinta 2 (S2)的期刊约占总数的19%或139种。第二,根据辛塔的数据,入选500名高产研究者名单的作家的生产力是来自PTKI的10人。在期刊和研究人员的生产力方面,国立伊斯兰高等教育(PTKIN)和私立伊斯兰高等教育(PTKIS)的分布并不均匀。本研究结果表明,在PTKI范围内,PTKIN与PTKIS之间以及PTKI与公立大学和其他研究机构之间的公平和合作是提高研究生产力的重要方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信