Comparison of Different Solvers and Geometry Representation Strategies for Dns of Rough Wall Channel Flow

Florian Theobald, K. Schäfer, Jiasheng Yang, B. Frohnapfel, M. Stripf, P. Forooghi, A. Stroh
{"title":"Comparison of Different Solvers and Geometry Representation Strategies for Dns of Rough Wall Channel Flow","authors":"Florian Theobald, K. Schäfer, Jiasheng Yang, B. Frohnapfel, M. Stripf, P. Forooghi, A. Stroh","doi":"10.23967/WCCM-ECCOMAS.2020.089","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the present study we investigate an incompressible turbulent channel flow with heat transfer at Reτ = 180 with a deterministic surface topography consisting of truncated cones. Two solvers for each of the two boundary handling strategies are considered. With Nek5000 and OpenFOAM the influence of the roughness elements is directly accounted for by an unstructured body fitted mesh, whereas Xcompact3d and SIMSON utilize the immersed boundary method (IBM) to deal with the 3D geometry. The main focus of this work is on an evaluation of the usability of the IBM and a comparison of the parallel performance of the different solvers. Since usability is an ambiguous definition, various quantities are compared: global statistics like Nusselt number and friction coefficient, one-dimensional wall-normal profiles for first and second order statistics, as well as three-dimensional averages over roughness sections. In addition, the computational effort for each method is documented.","PeriodicalId":148883,"journal":{"name":"14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress","volume":"223 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th WCCM-ECCOMAS Congress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23967/WCCM-ECCOMAS.2020.089","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In the present study we investigate an incompressible turbulent channel flow with heat transfer at Reτ = 180 with a deterministic surface topography consisting of truncated cones. Two solvers for each of the two boundary handling strategies are considered. With Nek5000 and OpenFOAM the influence of the roughness elements is directly accounted for by an unstructured body fitted mesh, whereas Xcompact3d and SIMSON utilize the immersed boundary method (IBM) to deal with the 3D geometry. The main focus of this work is on an evaluation of the usability of the IBM and a comparison of the parallel performance of the different solvers. Since usability is an ambiguous definition, various quantities are compared: global statistics like Nusselt number and friction coefficient, one-dimensional wall-normal profiles for first and second order statistics, as well as three-dimensional averages over roughness sections. In addition, the computational effort for each method is documented.
粗糙壁通道流的不同求解方法及几何表示策略的比较
在本研究中,我们研究了Reτ = 180处具有确定性表面形貌由截锥组成的不可压缩湍流通道流的传热。考虑了两种边界处理策略的两个求解器。对于Nek5000和OpenFOAM,粗糙度元素的影响直接由非结构化体拟合网格来考虑,而Xcompact3d和SIMSON则利用浸入边界法(IBM)来处理3D几何形状。这项工作的主要重点是对IBM的可用性进行评估,并比较不同求解器的并行性能。由于可用性是一个模棱两可的定义,因此比较了各种数量:像努塞尔数和摩擦系数这样的全局统计数据,一阶和二阶统计数据的一维墙法向曲线,以及粗糙部分的三维平均值。此外,每种方法的计算工作都有文档记录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信