Cost and reliability comparison of some static and dynamic multilayer resilience schemes

A. D. Giglio, Giovanni Di Giorgio, M. Quagliotti
{"title":"Cost and reliability comparison of some static and dynamic multilayer resilience schemes","authors":"A. D. Giglio, Giovanni Di Giorgio, M. Quagliotti","doi":"10.1109/DRCN.2005.1563862","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this paper is the analysis and the comparison of different resilience schemes in an IP over optical transport network. The properties which differentiate the resilience schemes considered in this work are: static vs. dynamic, with vs. without interaction between layers, relying vs. not relying on a common pool of back-up resources. The comparison has been performed from both an economic and a reliability performance viewpoint. The results obtained on a realistic case study show that the most advanced scheme (dynamic multilayer with common pool) allows interesting savings on resources and consequently costs. At the same it retains a network availability which is very close (practically equivalent) to the availability of static and more expensive schemes.","PeriodicalId":415896,"journal":{"name":"DRCN 2005). Proceedings.5th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks, 2005.","volume":"89 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DRCN 2005). Proceedings.5th International Workshop on Design of Reliable Communication Networks, 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/DRCN.2005.1563862","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The aim of this paper is the analysis and the comparison of different resilience schemes in an IP over optical transport network. The properties which differentiate the resilience schemes considered in this work are: static vs. dynamic, with vs. without interaction between layers, relying vs. not relying on a common pool of back-up resources. The comparison has been performed from both an economic and a reliability performance viewpoint. The results obtained on a realistic case study show that the most advanced scheme (dynamic multilayer with common pool) allows interesting savings on resources and consequently costs. At the same it retains a network availability which is very close (practically equivalent) to the availability of static and more expensive schemes.
几种静态和动态多层弹性方案的成本和可靠性比较
本文的目的是分析和比较IP over光传输网络中不同的弹性方案。区分本工作中考虑的弹性方案的属性是:静态与动态,层之间有与没有交互,依赖于与不依赖于公共备份资源池。从经济性和可靠性两方面进行了比较。一个实际案例研究的结果表明,最先进的方案(带公共池的动态多层)可以有效地节省资源和成本。同时,它保留的网络可用性非常接近(实际上相当于)静态和更昂贵的方案的可用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信