THE COGNITIVE MECHANISM OF THE SEMANTIC SHIFT TO TAKE UP → TO ABOLISH IN THE LIGHT OF TYPOLOGICAL DATA

Mariia V. Orlova
{"title":"THE COGNITIVE MECHANISM OF THE SEMANTIC SHIFT TO TAKE UP → TO ABOLISH IN THE LIGHT OF TYPOLOGICAL DATA","authors":"Mariia V. Orlova","doi":"10.28995/2686-7249-2022-5-92-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Based on the data of 11 languages belonging to three language groups (Hellenic, Germanic, and Romance) the article considers a range of semantic shifts forming a chain of meanings which, based on its outermost links, may be referred to as to take up → to abolish. The article analyzes the cognitive basis of the semantic development of verbs initially denoting the action to take up, a pattern assumed to be common for several languages and thus of particular significance for lexical and semantic typology. The structure of the chain reflects the idea of the distance between the relocated object and its original location gradually becoming greater, on the basis of which the meanings to take off and to take away are acquired. The final links of the chain (the meanings to destroy and to abolish) represent the ultimate realization of removal. The mechanism of meaning acquisition is assumed to differ between the shifts in the chain since three of the four derivative meanings are metonymical, while the meaning to abolish is of metaphorical nature.","PeriodicalId":124543,"journal":{"name":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RSUH/RGGU Bulletin. \"Literary Theory. Linguistics. Cultural Studies\" Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28995/2686-7249-2022-5-92-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Based on the data of 11 languages belonging to three language groups (Hellenic, Germanic, and Romance) the article considers a range of semantic shifts forming a chain of meanings which, based on its outermost links, may be referred to as to take up → to abolish. The article analyzes the cognitive basis of the semantic development of verbs initially denoting the action to take up, a pattern assumed to be common for several languages and thus of particular significance for lexical and semantic typology. The structure of the chain reflects the idea of the distance between the relocated object and its original location gradually becoming greater, on the basis of which the meanings to take off and to take away are acquired. The final links of the chain (the meanings to destroy and to abolish) represent the ultimate realization of removal. The mechanism of meaning acquisition is assumed to differ between the shifts in the chain since three of the four derivative meanings are metonymical, while the meaning to abolish is of metaphorical nature.
从类型资料看语义转移的认知机制
本文以希腊语、日耳曼语和罗曼语这三个语族的11种语言的数据为基础,考虑了一系列语义转移,形成了一条意义链,根据其最外层的链接,可以将其称为“接受”→“废除”。本文分析了动词语义发展的认知基础,即首先表示要采取的行动,这种模式被认为是几种语言的共同模式,因此对词汇和语义类型学具有特殊意义。链条的结构反映了搬迁对象与原位置之间的距离逐渐变大的想法,在此基础上获得了to take off和to take away的含义。链条的最后一环(意思是摧毁和废除)代表了移除的最终实现。由于四个衍生意义中有三个是转喻意义,而要废除的意义具有隐喻性质,因此假设在链的转换中意义获得的机制是不同的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信