‘Traditional Authorities’ and Community Rights in Contemporary Mozambique: between Activism and Incorporation

G. Martino
{"title":"‘Traditional Authorities’ and Community Rights in Contemporary Mozambique: between Activism and Incorporation","authors":"G. Martino","doi":"10.18540/revesvl4iss4pp13280-01-13e","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Mozambique’s donor-inspired ongoing programme of ‘traditional authorities’ ‘(re-)integration’ carries considerable emancipatory potential for local communities in their relations with central political institutions and the globalized economy. By analysing ‘traditional authorities’’ specifically elaborated discourse and highlighting their agency within the dynamics emerging from state institutions’ attempts at ‘incorporating’ them in the sense indicated by Zenker and Hoehne, that is, to deny them all political auton-omy, this article aims to clarify ‘traditional’ leaders’ role in defending their own com-munities’ interests and rights vis-à-vis the state, private enterprises, and development actors/donors. Close examination of empirical data collected during field research in Inhambane province provides convincing evidence of traditional authorities’ general inability to develop effective discursive strategies for the representation and defence of their communities’ interests and rights. By choosing to retreat within the domain of spirituality and to cede much of their statutory prerogatives to more dynamic and bet-ter resourced actors, ‘traditional authorities’ end up accepting their ‘incorporation’ into the institutional structure of the state as merely symbolic objects and sources of inter-nal as well as international legitimacy, thus obliterating their role as natural repre-sentatives of their communities.","PeriodicalId":281160,"journal":{"name":"REVES - Revista Relações Sociais","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVES - Revista Relações Sociais","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18540/revesvl4iss4pp13280-01-13e","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Mozambique’s donor-inspired ongoing programme of ‘traditional authorities’ ‘(re-)integration’ carries considerable emancipatory potential for local communities in their relations with central political institutions and the globalized economy. By analysing ‘traditional authorities’’ specifically elaborated discourse and highlighting their agency within the dynamics emerging from state institutions’ attempts at ‘incorporating’ them in the sense indicated by Zenker and Hoehne, that is, to deny them all political auton-omy, this article aims to clarify ‘traditional’ leaders’ role in defending their own com-munities’ interests and rights vis-à-vis the state, private enterprises, and development actors/donors. Close examination of empirical data collected during field research in Inhambane province provides convincing evidence of traditional authorities’ general inability to develop effective discursive strategies for the representation and defence of their communities’ interests and rights. By choosing to retreat within the domain of spirituality and to cede much of their statutory prerogatives to more dynamic and bet-ter resourced actors, ‘traditional authorities’ end up accepting their ‘incorporation’ into the institutional structure of the state as merely symbolic objects and sources of inter-nal as well as international legitimacy, thus obliterating their role as natural repre-sentatives of their communities.
当代莫桑比克的“传统权威”与社区权利:在行动主义与整合之间
莫桑比克由捐助者发起的“传统当局”“(重新)整合”的持续方案,在地方社区与中央政治机构和全球化经济的关系中具有相当大的解放潜力。通过分析“传统权威”具体阐述的话语,并强调他们在国家机构试图以Zenker和Hoehne所指出的意义“纳入”他们的动态中的代理作用,即否认他们所有的政治自主权,本文旨在澄清“传统”领导人在捍卫自己社区的利益和权利方面的作用-à-vis国家,私营企业,以及发展参与者/捐助者。对伊尼扬巴内省实地研究期间收集的经验数据的仔细研究提供了令人信服的证据,表明传统当局普遍无法制定有效的话语策略来代表和捍卫其社区的利益和权利。通过选择在精神领域内撤退,并将他们的法定特权让与更有活力和资源更充足的行动者,“传统权威”最终接受了他们被“纳入”到国家的制度结构中,仅仅作为象征性的对象和内部以及国际合法性的来源,从而抹掉了他们作为社区自然代表的角色。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信