A software tool for FCM aggregation employing credibility weights and learning OWA operators

Konstantinos Papageorgiou, E. Papageorgiou, P. Singh, G. Stamoulis
{"title":"A software tool for FCM aggregation employing credibility weights and learning OWA operators","authors":"Konstantinos Papageorgiou, E. Papageorgiou, P. Singh, G. Stamoulis","doi":"10.1109/IISA.2019.8900676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this study, we present the functionalities of a new tool for FCMs using credibility weights and OWA-based operators for aggregation tasks. The average aggregation method for weighted interconnections among concepts is the most used method in FCM modeling. The aim of this research work is to (i) propose an alternative aggregation method based on learning OWA operators in aggregating FCM weights, assigned by many experts and/or stakeholders and (ii) to estimate and rank the experts’ credibility using a distance-based method. The applicability and usefulness of the proposed methodology in modeling and decision-making is demonstrated using poverty eradication strategies under DAY-NRLM (Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Rural Livelihoods Mission) of India. The results produced by the proposed learning OWA operators are compared with the known average aggregation method of FCMs. These results imply that the proposed alternative FCM aggregation approach is really challenging when a large number of experts and stakeholders are engaged to design the overall FCM model.","PeriodicalId":371385,"journal":{"name":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","volume":"67 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 10th International Conference on Information, Intelligence, Systems and Applications (IISA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IISA.2019.8900676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In this study, we present the functionalities of a new tool for FCMs using credibility weights and OWA-based operators for aggregation tasks. The average aggregation method for weighted interconnections among concepts is the most used method in FCM modeling. The aim of this research work is to (i) propose an alternative aggregation method based on learning OWA operators in aggregating FCM weights, assigned by many experts and/or stakeholders and (ii) to estimate and rank the experts’ credibility using a distance-based method. The applicability and usefulness of the proposed methodology in modeling and decision-making is demonstrated using poverty eradication strategies under DAY-NRLM (Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Rural Livelihoods Mission) of India. The results produced by the proposed learning OWA operators are compared with the known average aggregation method of FCMs. These results imply that the proposed alternative FCM aggregation approach is really challenging when a large number of experts and stakeholders are engaged to design the overall FCM model.
采用可信度权重和学习OWA操作符的FCM聚合软件工具
在本研究中,我们为fcm提供了一个新工具的功能,该工具使用可信度权重和基于owa的算子进行聚合任务。概念间加权互连的平均聚合法是FCM建模中使用最多的方法。本研究工作的目的是:(i)提出一种基于学习OWA算子的替代聚合方法,用于聚合由许多专家和/或利益相关者分配的FCM权重;(ii)使用基于距离的方法估计专家的可信度并对其进行排序。通过印度DAY-NRLM (Deendayal Antyodaya Yojana-National Rural Livelihoods Mission)的消除贫困战略,证明了所提出方法在建模和决策方面的适用性和有用性。将所提出的OWA算子的学习结果与已知的fcm平均聚合方法进行了比较。这些结果表明,当大量专家和利益相关者参与设计整体FCM模型时,所提出的替代FCM聚合方法确实具有挑战性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信