PECULIARITIES OF STATE POLICY IN THE FIELD OF ANTI-CYCLIC REGULATION OF ECONOMY - THEORY AND METHODOLOGY

T. Marshalok
{"title":"PECULIARITIES OF STATE POLICY IN THE FIELD OF ANTI-CYCLIC REGULATION OF ECONOMY - THEORY AND METHODOLOGY","authors":"T. Marshalok","doi":"10.35774/rarrpsu2019.24.063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. Economic cycles, the periodic emergence of economic imbalances, deep economic crises, the need for effective management of economic fluctuations have created the need to develop an effective mechanism for anti-cyclical economic regulation. As a result of the in-depth study of these problems, it has been established that the most effective instruments of anti-cyclical economic regulation are financial instruments owned by the state and divided into monetary and fiscal ones. They in turn are divided into discretionary and non-discretionary, and regulated by legislative acts and regulatory documents.\nAs a result of a retrospective analysis of management of economic cycles through the use of financial means of the state, it has been proved that monetary policy is less sustainable than economic fiscal policy. On the contrary, for the last century, precarious monetary policy has caused many financial and economic upheavals; the world has seen at least three monetary and monetary systems that have been subject to a downturn every time. Therefore, it is not worth considering monetary policy sufficiently effective in the implementation of anti-cyclical regulation.\nWhile fiscal policies each time, in all economic crises, have played the role of a \"lifeline\" for countries that have taken anti-cyclical economic regulation measures.\nThat is why the study of the problem of effective state management of socio-economic fluctuations is one of the most urgent issues of economic science.\nThe goal of the work. To investigate the essence of monetary and fiscal instruments of counter-cyclical regulation of the economy, to identify their strengths and weaknesses, to propose effective mechanisms of counter-cyclical regulation of the economy, which would ensure economic development in the country.\nMethods. In the course of the research, general scientific and empirical methods of economic science based on a systematic approach are used, in particular: methods of scientific knowledge: dialectical and logical, analysis and synthesis, generalization, graphical, scientific abstraction - in the study of state financial policy in the field of anti-cyclical regulation of the economy.\nResults. The article deals with the essence of monetary and monetary systems, analyzes their weak and strong sides, identifies the causes of their decline. It was established that monetary factors influenced the emergence of centers of economic crises.\nThe essence of fiscal policy, its types and models, and the way in which its instruments influence the course of the economic cycle are considered and deeply analyzed. The mechanisms of fiscal policy, which should be used by the state at different stages of the economic cycle, are singled out. It is proved that in economically developed countries during the economic crisis it is expedient to use a socially-oriented model of fiscal policy of acyclic nature that most effectively influences the overcoming of economic imbalances and is capable of ensuring the economic equilibrium in the country as soon as possible. Countries that effectively applied the liberal model of fiscal policy, in the conditions of the economic crisis, were forced to resort to transformation towards a more rigid fiscal intervention by the state in economic processes-they were forced to use socially-oriented, acyclic fiscal policies. Only the wider participation of the state in the regulation of economic processes have ensured the rapid and effective overcoming of economic crises, and contributed to the achievement of economic development in most countries of the world.\nPerspectives. The results of scientific research can be useful for scientists and practitioners who are engaged in research on problems of anti-cyclical regulation of the economy, state financial policy and, in particular, fiscal policy.","PeriodicalId":312866,"journal":{"name":"Regional’ni aspekti rozvitku produktivnih sil Ukraїni","volume":"59 12","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Regional’ni aspekti rozvitku produktivnih sil Ukraїni","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35774/rarrpsu2019.24.063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Economic cycles, the periodic emergence of economic imbalances, deep economic crises, the need for effective management of economic fluctuations have created the need to develop an effective mechanism for anti-cyclical economic regulation. As a result of the in-depth study of these problems, it has been established that the most effective instruments of anti-cyclical economic regulation are financial instruments owned by the state and divided into monetary and fiscal ones. They in turn are divided into discretionary and non-discretionary, and regulated by legislative acts and regulatory documents. As a result of a retrospective analysis of management of economic cycles through the use of financial means of the state, it has been proved that monetary policy is less sustainable than economic fiscal policy. On the contrary, for the last century, precarious monetary policy has caused many financial and economic upheavals; the world has seen at least three monetary and monetary systems that have been subject to a downturn every time. Therefore, it is not worth considering monetary policy sufficiently effective in the implementation of anti-cyclical regulation. While fiscal policies each time, in all economic crises, have played the role of a "lifeline" for countries that have taken anti-cyclical economic regulation measures. That is why the study of the problem of effective state management of socio-economic fluctuations is one of the most urgent issues of economic science. The goal of the work. To investigate the essence of monetary and fiscal instruments of counter-cyclical regulation of the economy, to identify their strengths and weaknesses, to propose effective mechanisms of counter-cyclical regulation of the economy, which would ensure economic development in the country. Methods. In the course of the research, general scientific and empirical methods of economic science based on a systematic approach are used, in particular: methods of scientific knowledge: dialectical and logical, analysis and synthesis, generalization, graphical, scientific abstraction - in the study of state financial policy in the field of anti-cyclical regulation of the economy. Results. The article deals with the essence of monetary and monetary systems, analyzes their weak and strong sides, identifies the causes of their decline. It was established that monetary factors influenced the emergence of centers of economic crises. The essence of fiscal policy, its types and models, and the way in which its instruments influence the course of the economic cycle are considered and deeply analyzed. The mechanisms of fiscal policy, which should be used by the state at different stages of the economic cycle, are singled out. It is proved that in economically developed countries during the economic crisis it is expedient to use a socially-oriented model of fiscal policy of acyclic nature that most effectively influences the overcoming of economic imbalances and is capable of ensuring the economic equilibrium in the country as soon as possible. Countries that effectively applied the liberal model of fiscal policy, in the conditions of the economic crisis, were forced to resort to transformation towards a more rigid fiscal intervention by the state in economic processes-they were forced to use socially-oriented, acyclic fiscal policies. Only the wider participation of the state in the regulation of economic processes have ensured the rapid and effective overcoming of economic crises, and contributed to the achievement of economic development in most countries of the world. Perspectives. The results of scientific research can be useful for scientists and practitioners who are engaged in research on problems of anti-cyclical regulation of the economy, state financial policy and, in particular, fiscal policy.
国家政策在经济反周期调控领域的特殊性——理论与方法
介绍。经济周期、经济不平衡的周期性出现、深刻的经济危机、有效管理经济波动的需要,都使我们有必要制定一种有效的反周期经济调节机制。对这些问题的深入研究表明,最有效的反周期经济调控工具是国家所有的金融工具,分为货币工具和财政工具。它们又分为自由裁量权和非自由裁量权,并由立法行为和规范性文件加以规范。通过对国家运用金融手段管理经济周期的回顾性分析,证明货币政策的可持续性不如经济财政政策。相反,在上个世纪,不稳定的货币政策造成了许多金融和经济动荡;世界上至少有三种货币和货币体系每次都受到衰退的影响。因此,货币政策在实施逆周期调控中不够有效是不值得考虑的。而在所有的经济危机中,财政政策每次都对那些采取了反周期经济调控措施的国家起到了“生命线”的作用。这就是为什么对社会经济波动的有效国家管理问题的研究是经济科学中最紧迫的问题之一。工作的目标。研究货币和财政经济逆周期调控工具的本质,找出其优缺点,提出有效的经济逆周期调控机制,保障我国经济的发展。在研究过程中,运用了基于系统方法的经济科学的一般科学和实证方法,特别是运用了科学知识的方法:辩证与逻辑、分析与综合、概括、图解、科学抽象等,研究了国家财政政策在经济反周期调控领域的作用。本文论述了货币和货币制度的本质,分析了货币和货币制度的优缺点,指出了货币和货币制度衰落的原因。货币因素影响了经济危机中心的出现。财政政策的本质,它的类型和模型,以及它的工具影响经济周期进程的方式被考虑和深入分析。本文对国家在经济周期的不同阶段应采用的财政政策机制进行了分析。事实证明,在经济危机期间,经济发达国家采用以社会为导向的非周期性财政政策模式是权宜之计,这种模式最有效地影响克服经济失衡,并能够确保国家经济尽快达到均衡。在经济危机的条件下,有效地运用自由主义财政政策模式的国家,被迫在经济过程中转向更严格的国家财政干预——他们被迫使用面向社会的、无循环的财政政策。只有国家更广泛地参与经济进程的调节,才能确保迅速和有效地克服经济危机,并有助于实现世界上大多数国家的经济发展。科学研究的结果对从事经济反周期调控、国家财政政策特别是财政政策问题研究的科学家和实践者是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信