{"title":"Elusive luck: Contextualist approach to the Gettier problem","authors":"Ema Brajkovic","doi":"10.2298/theo2104083b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lewis' philosophical ambition to eradicate the skeptical threat towards\n infallibilism was the driving force behind his contextualist approach to\n knowledge. One of the discerning characteristics of his conversational\n contextualism is the claim that it can solve the Gettier problem. The first\n part of this paper will be directed towards explicating the arguments Lewis\n employed in reaching said solution. The second part will be concerned with\n Cohen?s critique of the proposed explanation. Cohen?s considerations result\n in an insight that contextualism does not have the adequate means to answer\n the Gettier challenge. Finally, I shall make an attempt at further\n motivating Cohen?s claim by investigating the essential component of Gettier\n cases - epistemic luck. This will be done by appealing to Pritchard?s\n concept of veritic epistemic luck. The author?s goal is to suggest that\n contextualist resources are neither suitable to solve nor exhaustively\n articulate the Gettier problem.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2104083b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Lewis' philosophical ambition to eradicate the skeptical threat towards
infallibilism was the driving force behind his contextualist approach to
knowledge. One of the discerning characteristics of his conversational
contextualism is the claim that it can solve the Gettier problem. The first
part of this paper will be directed towards explicating the arguments Lewis
employed in reaching said solution. The second part will be concerned with
Cohen?s critique of the proposed explanation. Cohen?s considerations result
in an insight that contextualism does not have the adequate means to answer
the Gettier challenge. Finally, I shall make an attempt at further
motivating Cohen?s claim by investigating the essential component of Gettier
cases - epistemic luck. This will be done by appealing to Pritchard?s
concept of veritic epistemic luck. The author?s goal is to suggest that
contextualist resources are neither suitable to solve nor exhaustively
articulate the Gettier problem.