Elusive luck: Contextualist approach to the Gettier problem

Ema Brajkovic
{"title":"Elusive luck: Contextualist approach to the Gettier problem","authors":"Ema Brajkovic","doi":"10.2298/theo2104083b","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lewis' philosophical ambition to eradicate the skeptical threat towards\n infallibilism was the driving force behind his contextualist approach to\n knowledge. One of the discerning characteristics of his conversational\n contextualism is the claim that it can solve the Gettier problem. The first\n part of this paper will be directed towards explicating the arguments Lewis\n employed in reaching said solution. The second part will be concerned with\n Cohen?s critique of the proposed explanation. Cohen?s considerations result\n in an insight that contextualism does not have the adequate means to answer\n the Gettier challenge. Finally, I shall make an attempt at further\n motivating Cohen?s claim by investigating the essential component of Gettier\n cases - epistemic luck. This will be done by appealing to Pritchard?s\n concept of veritic epistemic luck. The author?s goal is to suggest that\n contextualist resources are neither suitable to solve nor exhaustively\n articulate the Gettier problem.","PeriodicalId":374875,"journal":{"name":"Theoria, Beograd","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoria, Beograd","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/theo2104083b","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Lewis' philosophical ambition to eradicate the skeptical threat towards infallibilism was the driving force behind his contextualist approach to knowledge. One of the discerning characteristics of his conversational contextualism is the claim that it can solve the Gettier problem. The first part of this paper will be directed towards explicating the arguments Lewis employed in reaching said solution. The second part will be concerned with Cohen?s critique of the proposed explanation. Cohen?s considerations result in an insight that contextualism does not have the adequate means to answer the Gettier challenge. Finally, I shall make an attempt at further motivating Cohen?s claim by investigating the essential component of Gettier cases - epistemic luck. This will be done by appealing to Pritchard?s concept of veritic epistemic luck. The author?s goal is to suggest that contextualist resources are neither suitable to solve nor exhaustively articulate the Gettier problem.
难以捉摸的运气:格蒂埃问题的情境主义方法
刘易斯的哲学抱负是根除对绝对谬误论的怀疑威胁,这是他的语境主义知识方法背后的推动力。他的会话语境主义的一个显著特征是声称它可以解决格蒂埃问题。本文的第一部分将直接对刘易斯在达成上述解决方案所采用的论据进行说明。第二部分是关于科恩的?对提出的解释的批评。科恩?这一考虑导致了一种洞察力,即语境主义没有足够的手段来回答格蒂埃的挑战。最后,我将尝试进一步激励科恩。通过研究格蒂埃案例的基本组成部分——认知运气,我们得出了这个结论。这要通过向普理查德上诉来完成吗?S概念的真实性认识运气。作者?本文的目的是建议情境主义资源既不适合解决也不适合详尽地阐明盖蒂尔问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信