Single Tooth Restoration in the Maxilla with an Ultra-wide Diameter Implant: A Clinical Report

Nicholas Egbert, S. Ahuja, A. Selecman, R. Wicks
{"title":"Single Tooth Restoration in the Maxilla with an Ultra-wide Diameter Implant: A Clinical Report","authors":"Nicholas Egbert, S. Ahuja, A. Selecman, R. Wicks","doi":"10.1177/2229411220160308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immediate implant placement in the molar region is challenging due to complicated socket morphology, residual inter-radicular bone, and concurrence of the mandibular canal or maxillary sinus. These challenges may impede the placement of implants 10 mm or longer. Placing regular diameter implants <10 mm in length may result in poor primary stability, non-axial loading, increased functional overload, implant failure, compromised emergence profile, creation of a cantilever effect, difficulty in maintaining adequate hygiene around the restoration and the implant, and abutment screw loosening. Implant diameters >6 mm (“ultra-wide”) have been advocated to circumvent the disadvantages of regular diameter implants <10 mm in length in the molar regions. The purpose of this article is to report a case utilizing an ultra-wide diameter implant (Max Dental Implant System, Keystone Dental, Burlington, MA) to replace an extracted molar tooth.","PeriodicalId":116198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2229411220160308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Immediate implant placement in the molar region is challenging due to complicated socket morphology, residual inter-radicular bone, and concurrence of the mandibular canal or maxillary sinus. These challenges may impede the placement of implants 10 mm or longer. Placing regular diameter implants <10 mm in length may result in poor primary stability, non-axial loading, increased functional overload, implant failure, compromised emergence profile, creation of a cantilever effect, difficulty in maintaining adequate hygiene around the restoration and the implant, and abutment screw loosening. Implant diameters >6 mm (“ultra-wide”) have been advocated to circumvent the disadvantages of regular diameter implants <10 mm in length in the molar regions. The purpose of this article is to report a case utilizing an ultra-wide diameter implant (Max Dental Implant System, Keystone Dental, Burlington, MA) to replace an extracted molar tooth.
超宽直径种植体修复上颌单牙的临床报告
由于牙槽形态复杂,根间骨残留,下颌管或上颌窦共用,在磨牙区即刻种植具有挑战性。这些挑战可能会阻碍植入物放置10毫米或更长。在磨牙区域放置常规直径6mm(“超宽”)的种植体,以避免常规直径小于10mm的种植体的缺点。本文的目的是报告一个使用超宽直径种植体(Max Dental implant System, Keystone Dental, Burlington, MA)替代拔出的磨牙的病例。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信