{"title":"Single Tooth Restoration in the Maxilla with an Ultra-wide Diameter Implant: A Clinical Report","authors":"Nicholas Egbert, S. Ahuja, A. Selecman, R. Wicks","doi":"10.1177/2229411220160308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Immediate implant placement in the molar region is challenging due to complicated socket morphology, residual inter-radicular bone, and concurrence of the mandibular canal or maxillary sinus. These challenges may impede the placement of implants 10 mm or longer. Placing regular diameter implants <10 mm in length may result in poor primary stability, non-axial loading, increased functional overload, implant failure, compromised emergence profile, creation of a cantilever effect, difficulty in maintaining adequate hygiene around the restoration and the implant, and abutment screw loosening. Implant diameters >6 mm (“ultra-wide”) have been advocated to circumvent the disadvantages of regular diameter implants <10 mm in length in the molar regions. The purpose of this article is to report a case utilizing an ultra-wide diameter implant (Max Dental Implant System, Keystone Dental, Burlington, MA) to replace an extracted molar tooth.","PeriodicalId":116198,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","volume":"32 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Academy of Advanced Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/2229411220160308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Immediate implant placement in the molar region is challenging due to complicated socket morphology, residual inter-radicular bone, and concurrence of the mandibular canal or maxillary sinus. These challenges may impede the placement of implants 10 mm or longer. Placing regular diameter implants <10 mm in length may result in poor primary stability, non-axial loading, increased functional overload, implant failure, compromised emergence profile, creation of a cantilever effect, difficulty in maintaining adequate hygiene around the restoration and the implant, and abutment screw loosening. Implant diameters >6 mm (“ultra-wide”) have been advocated to circumvent the disadvantages of regular diameter implants <10 mm in length in the molar regions. The purpose of this article is to report a case utilizing an ultra-wide diameter implant (Max Dental Implant System, Keystone Dental, Burlington, MA) to replace an extracted molar tooth.