Internet law and cybersecurity of the PRC

S. Korolev, I. Lyalina
{"title":"Internet law and cybersecurity of the PRC","authors":"S. Korolev, I. Lyalina","doi":"10.17803/2311-5998.2023.102.2.162-167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The history of the emergence and subsequent cross-border evolution of Internet law around the world is, in a sense, paradoxical. The creators of the first version of the Internet as a national security information system hardly imagined that the legal regulation of the Internet, primarily in Western Europe, would fall under the influence of the Romano-Germanic legal system. We are talking about the basic division of the national legal order for continental Europe into public law (jus publicum) and private law (jus privatum). Accordingly, cybersecurity and other public needs of the Internet in continental Europe have become the subject of public Internet law. On the contrary, the specifics and protection of the individual rights of users and entrepreneurs in the Internet space have become the subject of regulation of private Internet law. In the context of such differentiation of the Internet space, the experience of the PRC is of particular interest, where the ratio of public need and private interest, due to the specifics of Chinese civilization, cannot be interpreted in the spirit of Western European dualism.","PeriodicalId":238867,"journal":{"name":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL))","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2023.102.2.162-167","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The history of the emergence and subsequent cross-border evolution of Internet law around the world is, in a sense, paradoxical. The creators of the first version of the Internet as a national security information system hardly imagined that the legal regulation of the Internet, primarily in Western Europe, would fall under the influence of the Romano-Germanic legal system. We are talking about the basic division of the national legal order for continental Europe into public law (jus publicum) and private law (jus privatum). Accordingly, cybersecurity and other public needs of the Internet in continental Europe have become the subject of public Internet law. On the contrary, the specifics and protection of the individual rights of users and entrepreneurs in the Internet space have become the subject of regulation of private Internet law. In the context of such differentiation of the Internet space, the experience of the PRC is of particular interest, where the ratio of public need and private interest, due to the specifics of Chinese civilization, cannot be interpreted in the spirit of Western European dualism.
中国互联网法律与网络安全
从某种意义上说,互联网法律在世界各地的出现和随后的跨界演变的历史是矛盾的。互联网作为国家安全信息系统的第一个版本的创造者很难想象,主要在西欧的互联网的法律监管会受到罗马-日耳曼法律体系的影响。我们讨论的是欧洲大陆国家法律秩序的基本划分,即公法(jus publicum)和私法(jus privatum)。因此,欧洲大陆的网络安全和互联网的其他公共需求成为公共互联网法的主题。相反,对互联网空间中用户和企业家个人权利的具体规定和保护,成为互联网私法规制的主题。在这种互联网空间分化的背景下,中国的经验是特别有趣的,在中国,由于中国文明的特殊性,公共需求和私人利益的比例不能用西欧二元论的精神来解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信