Beyond the planetary boundaries: exploring pluralistic accountability in the new space age

Patrizia Di Tullio, Matteo La Torre, M. A. Rea, J. Guthrie, J. Dumay
{"title":"Beyond the planetary boundaries: exploring pluralistic accountability in the new space age","authors":"Patrizia Di Tullio, Matteo La Torre, M. A. Rea, J. Guthrie, J. Dumay","doi":"10.1108/aaaj-08-2022-6003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeNew Space activities offer benefits for human progress and life beyond the Earth. However, there is a risk that the New Space Economy may develop according to an anthropocentric mindset favouring human progress and survival at the expense of all other species and the environment. This mindset raises concerns over the social and environmental impacts of space activities and the accountability of space actors. This research article explores the accountability of space actors by presenting a pluralistic accountability framework to understand, inspire and change accountability in the New Space Economy. This study also identifies future research opportunities.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a reflective and normative essay. The arguments are developed using contemporary multidisciplinary academic literature, publicly available evidence and examples. Further, the authors use Dillard and Vinnari's accountability framework to examine a pluralistic accountability system for space businesses.FindingsThe New Space Economy requires public and private entities to embrace hybrid and pluralistic accountability for their social and environmental impacts. A new way of seeing the relationship between human life, the Earth and celestial space is needed. Accounting language is used to mirror and mobilise broader forms of responsibility in those involved in space.Originality/valueThis paper responds to the AAAJ's special issue call for examining how accountability can be ensured in the New Space Age. The space activities businesses conduct, and the anthropocentric view inspiring their race toward space is concerning. Hence, the authors advocate the need for rethinking accountability between humans and nature. The paper contributes to fostering the debate on social and environmental accounting and the accountability of space actors in the New Space Economy. To this end, the authors use a pluralistic accountability framework to help understand how the New Space Economy can face the risks emanating from its anthropocentric mindset.","PeriodicalId":132341,"journal":{"name":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","volume":"103 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaaj-08-2022-6003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeNew Space activities offer benefits for human progress and life beyond the Earth. However, there is a risk that the New Space Economy may develop according to an anthropocentric mindset favouring human progress and survival at the expense of all other species and the environment. This mindset raises concerns over the social and environmental impacts of space activities and the accountability of space actors. This research article explores the accountability of space actors by presenting a pluralistic accountability framework to understand, inspire and change accountability in the New Space Economy. This study also identifies future research opportunities.Design/methodology/approachThis paper is a reflective and normative essay. The arguments are developed using contemporary multidisciplinary academic literature, publicly available evidence and examples. Further, the authors use Dillard and Vinnari's accountability framework to examine a pluralistic accountability system for space businesses.FindingsThe New Space Economy requires public and private entities to embrace hybrid and pluralistic accountability for their social and environmental impacts. A new way of seeing the relationship between human life, the Earth and celestial space is needed. Accounting language is used to mirror and mobilise broader forms of responsibility in those involved in space.Originality/valueThis paper responds to the AAAJ's special issue call for examining how accountability can be ensured in the New Space Age. The space activities businesses conduct, and the anthropocentric view inspiring their race toward space is concerning. Hence, the authors advocate the need for rethinking accountability between humans and nature. The paper contributes to fostering the debate on social and environmental accounting and the accountability of space actors in the New Space Economy. To this end, the authors use a pluralistic accountability framework to help understand how the New Space Economy can face the risks emanating from its anthropocentric mindset.
超越地球边界:探索新太空时代的多元问责制
新的太空活动为人类进步和地球以外的生命提供了好处。然而,有一种风险是,新空间经济可能会根据一种以人类为中心的思维方式发展,以牺牲所有其他物种和环境为代价,促进人类的进步和生存。这种心态引起了人们对空间活动的社会和环境影响以及空间行为体的问责制的关注。本文通过提出一个多元化的问责框架来探讨空间行为体的问责,以理解、启发和改变新空间经济中的问责。本研究还确定了未来的研究机会。设计/方法/方法这篇论文是一篇反思性和规范性的论文。这些论点是利用当代多学科的学术文献、公开的证据和例子来发展的。此外,作者使用Dillard和Vinnari的问责框架来研究航天企业的多元问责制度。新空间经济要求公共和私营实体对其社会和环境影响承担混合和多元化的责任。我们需要一种新的方式来看待人类生命、地球和太空之间的关系。会计语言被用来反映和调动空间相关人员更广泛的责任形式。原创性/价值本文回应了AAAJ的特刊呼吁,探讨如何在新太空时代确保问责制。企业开展的太空活动,以及激发他们向太空竞赛的人类中心主义观点令人担忧。因此,作者主张有必要重新思考人与自然之间的责任。该文件有助于促进关于社会和环境会计以及新空间经济中空间行动者的问责制的辩论。为此,作者使用了一个多元化的问责框架来帮助理解新太空经济如何面对其人类中心主义思维方式所带来的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信