Resistance Resurgent: Resurrecting a Method of Irregular Warfare in Great Power Competition

Otto C. Fiala
{"title":"Resistance Resurgent: Resurrecting a Method of Irregular Warfare in Great Power Competition","authors":"Otto C. Fiala","doi":"10.1080/23296151.2021.1994746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The U.S. has spent the last two decades, during its short time as the singular superpower, engaging relatively successfully in counterterrorism. However, we have now entered a new era of Great Power Competition (GPC) with adversaries; Russia and China. In the last decade, these nations have either caught up to the U.S. or have gained a slight edge in several types of warfare, while they challenge the international order created and dominated by the U.S. In particular, Russian threats loom over our NATO Baltic allies, while Chinese threats loom over the South China Sea and Taiwan. The U.S. has inadequate conventional deterrence forces ing each of these theaters and likely could not respond to crisis in each area simultaneously. Concurrently, though not allied, Russia and China have increased cooperation. It will take many years for the U.S. to build adequate conventional forces to prevent each of these adversaries from asserting their will and taking and holding the sovereign territory of our allies or partners. Yet history reveals a type pf warfare for which we and our allies and partners can prepare for immediately at little cost to add a layer of deterrence to assist in denying ultimate victory to our adversaries with scarce dedication of resources. It is a type of warfare that can asymmetrically impose costs on an occupier by forcing him to devote substantial resources to his own security while also making his political consolidation of the occupied territory very difficult if not impossible. Its methods range from violence led by an authorized organization fighting to reclaim sovereignty, to passive and peaceful activities by the general population. This method of warfare, which must be organized, trained and equipped immediately, is resistance.","PeriodicalId":276818,"journal":{"name":"Special Operations Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Special Operations Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23296151.2021.1994746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT The U.S. has spent the last two decades, during its short time as the singular superpower, engaging relatively successfully in counterterrorism. However, we have now entered a new era of Great Power Competition (GPC) with adversaries; Russia and China. In the last decade, these nations have either caught up to the U.S. or have gained a slight edge in several types of warfare, while they challenge the international order created and dominated by the U.S. In particular, Russian threats loom over our NATO Baltic allies, while Chinese threats loom over the South China Sea and Taiwan. The U.S. has inadequate conventional deterrence forces ing each of these theaters and likely could not respond to crisis in each area simultaneously. Concurrently, though not allied, Russia and China have increased cooperation. It will take many years for the U.S. to build adequate conventional forces to prevent each of these adversaries from asserting their will and taking and holding the sovereign territory of our allies or partners. Yet history reveals a type pf warfare for which we and our allies and partners can prepare for immediately at little cost to add a layer of deterrence to assist in denying ultimate victory to our adversaries with scarce dedication of resources. It is a type of warfare that can asymmetrically impose costs on an occupier by forcing him to devote substantial resources to his own security while also making his political consolidation of the occupied territory very difficult if not impossible. Its methods range from violence led by an authorized organization fighting to reclaim sovereignty, to passive and peaceful activities by the general population. This method of warfare, which must be organized, trained and equipped immediately, is resistance.
复兴抵抗:大国竞争中非常规战争的复活
在过去的二十年里,在美国作为唯一超级大国的短暂时间里,美国在反恐方面取得了相对成功。然而,我们现在已经进入了一个与对手进行大国竞争的新时代;俄罗斯和中国。在过去的十年里,这些国家要么赶上了美国,要么在几种类型的战争中获得了轻微的优势,同时他们挑战了由美国创建和主导的国际秩序。特别是,俄罗斯威胁着我们的北约波罗的海盟国,而中国威胁着南中国海和台湾。美国在这些战区的常规威慑力量不足,可能无法同时应对每个地区的危机。与此同时,俄罗斯和中国虽然没有结盟,但也加强了合作。美国需要许多年的时间来建立足够的常规力量,以防止这些对手中的任何一个坚持自己的意志,夺取和控制我们的盟友或伙伴的主权领土。然而,历史揭示了一种战争类型,我们和我们的盟友和伙伴可以立即准备以很少的成本增加一层威慑,以帮助在资源稀缺的情况下阻止我们的对手取得最终胜利。这种战争可以不对称地使占领者付出代价,迫使他为自己的安全投入大量资源,同时也使他对被占领领土的政治巩固变得非常困难,如果不是不可能的话。其方法包括由一个获授权的组织领导的为收回主权而战斗的暴力,以及由一般民众进行的被动的和平活动。这种必须立即组织起来,训练起来,装备起来的作战方法,就是抵抗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信