Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool

Colby Gregg, Amanda Bowling
{"title":"Undergraduate Student Perceptions of Cooperative Discussion Groups as a Classroom Engagement Tool","authors":"Colby Gregg, Amanda Bowling","doi":"10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.92","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this project was to explore the experiences of students when facilitating class discussions through cooperative discussion groups. In addition, students particularly compared their experiences within this class with their experiences in Whole Class Discussion in previous classes. Students participated in structured cooperative discussion groups and submitted three written answers to reflection prompts provided as an extra credit opportunity. Based on the written answers (n = 11), select participants (n = 4) were purposively chosen for a semi-structured interview. Upon analysis of the data, five themes arose that described what students took away from this teaching method. Among these themes include how student groups facilitated collaboration among peers, deepened understanding of course materials, and allowed students to reflect on not only their own past experiences but those of their classmates as well. The researchers encourage instructors to consider using this teaching method as they approach curricula that either includes the development of individual philosophies or class sessions where it would be valuable for students to listen to their classmates’ experiences.","PeriodicalId":421640,"journal":{"name":"NACTA Journal","volume":"120 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NACTA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56103/nactaj.v67i1.92","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this project was to explore the experiences of students when facilitating class discussions through cooperative discussion groups. In addition, students particularly compared their experiences within this class with their experiences in Whole Class Discussion in previous classes. Students participated in structured cooperative discussion groups and submitted three written answers to reflection prompts provided as an extra credit opportunity. Based on the written answers (n = 11), select participants (n = 4) were purposively chosen for a semi-structured interview. Upon analysis of the data, five themes arose that described what students took away from this teaching method. Among these themes include how student groups facilitated collaboration among peers, deepened understanding of course materials, and allowed students to reflect on not only their own past experiences but those of their classmates as well. The researchers encourage instructors to consider using this teaching method as they approach curricula that either includes the development of individual philosophies or class sessions where it would be valuable for students to listen to their classmates’ experiences.
大学生对合作讨论小组作为课堂参与工具的认知
这个项目的目的是探索学生在通过合作讨论小组促进课堂讨论时的经验。此外,学生们特别将他们在这堂课上的经历与之前课堂上的全班讨论的经历进行了比较。学生参加了结构化的合作讨论小组,并提交了三份书面答案,以反思提示作为额外的学分机会。根据书面回答(n = 11),有目的地选择参与者(n = 4)进行半结构化访谈。通过对数据的分析,出现了五个主题,描述了学生从这种教学方法中得到了什么。这些主题包括学生小组如何促进同龄人之间的合作,加深对课程材料的理解,以及让学生不仅反思自己过去的经历,也反思同学们过去的经历。研究人员鼓励教师考虑使用这种教学方法,因为他们的课程要么包括个人哲学的发展,要么包括对学生有价值的课堂,让学生倾听同学的经历。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信