Comparison of Relational Database with Document-Oriented Database (MongoDB) for Big Data Applications

Satyadhyan Chickerur, Anoop Goudar, Ankita Kinnerkar
{"title":"Comparison of Relational Database with Document-Oriented Database (MongoDB) for Big Data Applications","authors":"Satyadhyan Chickerur, Anoop Goudar, Ankita Kinnerkar","doi":"10.1109/ASEA.2015.19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Database can accommodate a very large number of users on an on-demand basis. The main limitations with conventional relational database management systems (RDBMS) are that they are hard to scale with Data warehousing, Grid, Web 2.0 and Cloud applications, have non-linear query execution time, have unstable query plans and have static schema. Even though RDBMS's have provided database users with the best mix of simplicity, robustness, flexibility, performance, scalability and compatibility but they are not able to satisfy the present day users and applications for the reasons mentioned above. The next generation NonSQL (NoSQL) databases are mostly non-relational, distributed and horizontally scalable and are able to satisfy most of the needs of the present day applications. The main characteristics of these databases are schema-free, no join, non-relational, easy replication support, simple API and eventually consistent. The aim of this paper is to illustrate how a problem being solved using MySQL will perform when MongoDB is used on a Big data dataset. The results are encouraging and clearly showcase the comparisons made. Queries are executed on a big data airlines database using both MongoDB and MySQL. Select, update, delete and insert queries are executed and performance is evaluated.","PeriodicalId":259240,"journal":{"name":"2015 8th International Conference on Advanced Software Engineering & Its Applications (ASEA)","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-11-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"41","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 8th International Conference on Advanced Software Engineering & Its Applications (ASEA)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASEA.2015.19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 41

Abstract

Database can accommodate a very large number of users on an on-demand basis. The main limitations with conventional relational database management systems (RDBMS) are that they are hard to scale with Data warehousing, Grid, Web 2.0 and Cloud applications, have non-linear query execution time, have unstable query plans and have static schema. Even though RDBMS's have provided database users with the best mix of simplicity, robustness, flexibility, performance, scalability and compatibility but they are not able to satisfy the present day users and applications for the reasons mentioned above. The next generation NonSQL (NoSQL) databases are mostly non-relational, distributed and horizontally scalable and are able to satisfy most of the needs of the present day applications. The main characteristics of these databases are schema-free, no join, non-relational, easy replication support, simple API and eventually consistent. The aim of this paper is to illustrate how a problem being solved using MySQL will perform when MongoDB is used on a Big data dataset. The results are encouraging and clearly showcase the comparisons made. Queries are executed on a big data airlines database using both MongoDB and MySQL. Select, update, delete and insert queries are executed and performance is evaluated.
面向大数据应用的关系型数据库与面向文档型数据库(MongoDB)的比较
数据库可以按需容纳大量的用户。传统的关系型数据库管理系统(RDBMS)的主要限制是,它们很难与数据仓库、网格、Web 2.0和云应用程序进行扩展,查询执行时间是非线性的,查询计划不稳定,并且具有静态模式。尽管RDBMS为数据库用户提供了简单性、健壮性、灵活性、性能、可伸缩性和兼容性的最佳组合,但由于上面提到的原因,它们无法满足当前的用户和应用程序。下一代非sql (NoSQL)数据库大多是非关系型的、分布式的、水平可伸缩的,能够满足当今应用程序的大部分需求。这些数据库的主要特点是无模式、无连接、非关系、易于复制支持、简单的API和最终的一致性。本文的目的是说明当MongoDB用于大数据数据集时,使用MySQL解决的问题将如何执行。结果令人鼓舞,并清楚地展示了所做的比较。查询使用MongoDB和MySQL在大数据航空公司数据库上执行。执行选择、更新、删除和插入查询,并评估性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信