The subject, object and the duty to provide evidence

C. Murzea
{"title":"The subject, object and the duty to provide evidence","authors":"C. Murzea","doi":"10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.4.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In our usual language, the word “evidence” represents the mental and logical operation by which we attempt to prove something, to demonstrate, to emphasize a statement which provides credibility to a certain situation. The institution of evidence in the system of objective law was regulated in certain legal texts, with different regulations, from material law to procedural law, depending on the different factors which configure private law, but also in direct connection with the lawmaker’s interest. As a consequence, in the past, the matter of evidence was studied within the general theory of civil law, whereas, in present times, evidence is studied within Civil Procedural Law. The matter of evidence would be known differently and treated differently both by law and by doctrine, thus having a different space “and a different setting between the institutions of civil material and procedural law”.","PeriodicalId":298214,"journal":{"name":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SERIES VII - SOCIAL SCIENCES AND LAW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31926/but.ssl.2020.13.62.4.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In our usual language, the word “evidence” represents the mental and logical operation by which we attempt to prove something, to demonstrate, to emphasize a statement which provides credibility to a certain situation. The institution of evidence in the system of objective law was regulated in certain legal texts, with different regulations, from material law to procedural law, depending on the different factors which configure private law, but also in direct connection with the lawmaker’s interest. As a consequence, in the past, the matter of evidence was studied within the general theory of civil law, whereas, in present times, evidence is studied within Civil Procedural Law. The matter of evidence would be known differently and treated differently both by law and by doctrine, thus having a different space “and a different setting between the institutions of civil material and procedural law”.
主体、客体和举证义务
在我们通常的语言中,“证据”这个词代表了一种心理和逻辑操作,通过这种操作,我们试图证明某事,展示,强调为某种情况提供可信度的陈述。客观法体系中的证据制度是在特定的法律文本中进行规范的,从实体法到程序法都有不同的规定,这取决于构成私法的不同因素,但也与立法者的利益直接相关。因此,在过去,证据问题是在民法一般理论范围内研究的,而现在,证据问题是在民事诉讼法范围内研究的。法律和理论对证据问题的认识和处理将有所不同,因此在“民事物权法和程序法制度之间”具有不同的空间和不同的背景。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信