A Fraction of a Percent: A Call to Legal Service Providers to Increase Assistance to Community Nonprofits Using Biglaw Pro Bono

R. Nieman
{"title":"A Fraction of a Percent: A Call to Legal Service Providers to Increase Assistance to Community Nonprofits Using Biglaw Pro Bono","authors":"R. Nieman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3022260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I believe the Legal Services Corporation is remiss in not encouraging its grantees to focus their attention on assisting low-income, community nonprofits with their legal needs. The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) is one of the largest grantors to legal aid organizations in the country. In 2014, LSC grantees closed a total of 757,983 cases, of which 80,953 of those cases were completed with the involvement of pro bono attorneys. On average, LSC funding amounts to approximately 36.5% of each legal aid organization’s overall funding source. However, LSC has seemed to turn a blind eye to the notion that legal aid to small, low-income nonprofits should be part of the robust assistance provided by its grantees. For example, in its 2014 report, LSC noted that out of 758,689 cases closed; only 290 of those cases consisted of legal assistance to nonprofits. That amounts to 0.00038% of all cases! LSC allows its grantees to provide legal assistance to nonprofits, but it appears that those types of cases are merely an afterthought. \n \nThere are three distinct reasons this assistance is necessary and logical. First, the low-income, community nonprofits assist the same clients LSC funded legal aid organizations assist. Therefore, to help the nonprofit would be to help the legal aid client. Second, finding meaningful pro bono projects that large firm volunteers are comfortable in handling is difficult. Most of the legal needs of nonprofits involve business transactional work. Helping a nonprofit with its legal needs is oftentimes within the legal knowledge base of large firms who have business transactional departments. Many of the large law firm attorneys may not have experience or a comfort level in helping with family or eviction cases (which often make up the majority of LSC funded organizations’ cases) and therefore find it difficult to volunteer. However, having the option to assist with local, small nonprofits that cannot afford legal representation, will further utilize the large firms’ legal skills in a meaningful way both for the legal aid organization and for the big law firm. Third, working with low-income, local nonprofits will take LSC and its grantees back to its community roots, working in cooperation with and supporting community organizations that create wealth and address other poverty-related problems identified by community members.","PeriodicalId":330356,"journal":{"name":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","volume":"97 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Law & Society: The Legal Profession eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3022260","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I believe the Legal Services Corporation is remiss in not encouraging its grantees to focus their attention on assisting low-income, community nonprofits with their legal needs. The Legal Services Corporation (LSC) is one of the largest grantors to legal aid organizations in the country. In 2014, LSC grantees closed a total of 757,983 cases, of which 80,953 of those cases were completed with the involvement of pro bono attorneys. On average, LSC funding amounts to approximately 36.5% of each legal aid organization’s overall funding source. However, LSC has seemed to turn a blind eye to the notion that legal aid to small, low-income nonprofits should be part of the robust assistance provided by its grantees. For example, in its 2014 report, LSC noted that out of 758,689 cases closed; only 290 of those cases consisted of legal assistance to nonprofits. That amounts to 0.00038% of all cases! LSC allows its grantees to provide legal assistance to nonprofits, but it appears that those types of cases are merely an afterthought. There are three distinct reasons this assistance is necessary and logical. First, the low-income, community nonprofits assist the same clients LSC funded legal aid organizations assist. Therefore, to help the nonprofit would be to help the legal aid client. Second, finding meaningful pro bono projects that large firm volunteers are comfortable in handling is difficult. Most of the legal needs of nonprofits involve business transactional work. Helping a nonprofit with its legal needs is oftentimes within the legal knowledge base of large firms who have business transactional departments. Many of the large law firm attorneys may not have experience or a comfort level in helping with family or eviction cases (which often make up the majority of LSC funded organizations’ cases) and therefore find it difficult to volunteer. However, having the option to assist with local, small nonprofits that cannot afford legal representation, will further utilize the large firms’ legal skills in a meaningful way both for the legal aid organization and for the big law firm. Third, working with low-income, local nonprofits will take LSC and its grantees back to its community roots, working in cooperation with and supporting community organizations that create wealth and address other poverty-related problems identified by community members.
百分之一的零头:呼吁法律服务提供者使用Biglaw公益服务增加对社区非营利组织的援助
我认为,法律服务公司没有鼓励受助人把注意力集中在帮助低收入社区非营利组织解决他们的法律需求上,这是一种疏忽。法律服务公司(LSC)是该国法律援助组织最大的资助者之一。2014年,LSC受助人共结案757,983件,其中80,953件是在公益律师的参与下完成的。平均而言,LSC的资金约占每个法律援助机构总资金来源的36.5%。然而,LSC似乎对这样一种观念视而不见:对小型、低收入非营利组织的法律援助应该是其受助人提供的有力援助的一部分。例如,LSC在2014年的报告中指出,在已结案的758,689起案件中;这些案例中只有290个是向非营利组织提供法律援助的。这相当于所有病例的0.00038% !LSC允许其受助人向非营利组织提供法律援助,但这类案件似乎只是事后的想法。有三个明显的理由说明这种援助是必要和合乎逻辑的。首先,低收入的社区非营利组织帮助LSC资助的法律援助组织所帮助的客户。因此,帮助非营利组织就是帮助法律援助的客户。其次,很难找到大公司志愿者乐于处理的有意义的公益项目。非营利组织的大部分法律需求涉及商业交易工作。帮助非营利组织解决其法律需求通常是在拥有商业交易部门的大公司的法律知识库范围内。许多大型律师事务所的律师可能没有帮助家庭或驱逐案件(这通常构成LSC资助组织的大部分案件)的经验或舒适水平,因此很难成为志愿者。然而,选择帮助当地的小型非营利组织,这些组织负担不起法律代理费用,将进一步利用大公司的法律技能,以一种有意义的方式为法律援助组织和大律师事务所服务。第三,与低收入的当地非营利组织合作,将LSC及其受助人带回其社区根源,与创造财富和解决社区成员确定的其他与贫困有关的问题的社区组织合作并提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信