Diachronic Analysis of Users' Stances on COVID-19 Vaccination in Japan using Twitter

Shohei Hisamitsu, Sho Cho, Hongshan Jin, Masashi Toyoda, Naoki Yoshinaga
{"title":"Diachronic Analysis of Users' Stances on COVID-19 Vaccination in Japan using Twitter","authors":"Shohei Hisamitsu, Sho Cho, Hongshan Jin, Masashi Toyoda, Naoki Yoshinaga","doi":"10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068695","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To prevent and curb viral outbreaks, such as COVID-19, it is important to increase vaccination coverage while resolving vaccine hesitancy and refusal. To understand why COVID-19 vaccination coverage had rapidly increased in Japan, we analyzed Twitter posts (tweets) to track the evolution of people's stance on vaccination and clarify the factors of why people decide to vaccinate. We collected all Japanese tweets related to vaccines over a five-month period and classified the vaccination stances of users who posted those tweets by using a deep neural network we designed. Examining diachronic changes in the users' stances on this large-scale vaccine dataset, we found that a certain number of neutral users changed to a pro-vaccine stance while very few changed to an anti-vaccine stance in Japan. Investigation of their information-sharing behaviors revealed what types of users and external sites were referred to when they changed their stances. These findings will help increase coverage of booster doses and future vaccinations.","PeriodicalId":423113,"journal":{"name":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","volume":"127 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 IEEE/ACM International Conference on Advances in Social Networks Analysis and Mining (ASONAM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ASONAM55673.2022.10068695","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

To prevent and curb viral outbreaks, such as COVID-19, it is important to increase vaccination coverage while resolving vaccine hesitancy and refusal. To understand why COVID-19 vaccination coverage had rapidly increased in Japan, we analyzed Twitter posts (tweets) to track the evolution of people's stance on vaccination and clarify the factors of why people decide to vaccinate. We collected all Japanese tweets related to vaccines over a five-month period and classified the vaccination stances of users who posted those tweets by using a deep neural network we designed. Examining diachronic changes in the users' stances on this large-scale vaccine dataset, we found that a certain number of neutral users changed to a pro-vaccine stance while very few changed to an anti-vaccine stance in Japan. Investigation of their information-sharing behaviors revealed what types of users and external sites were referred to when they changed their stances. These findings will help increase coverage of booster doses and future vaccinations.
日本推特用户对COVID-19疫苗接种立场的历时分析
为了预防和遏制COVID-19等病毒暴发,必须在解决疫苗犹豫和拒绝接种问题的同时提高疫苗接种覆盖率。为了理解为什么日本的COVID-19疫苗接种覆盖率迅速提高,我们分析了推特(tweets),以跟踪人们对疫苗接种立场的演变,并澄清人们决定接种疫苗的因素。我们收集了五个月内所有与疫苗相关的日本推文,并使用我们设计的深度神经网络对发布这些推文的用户的疫苗接种立场进行了分类。通过对这一大规模疫苗数据集上用户立场的历时变化进行研究,我们发现,在日本,一定数量的中立用户转变为支持疫苗的立场,而很少有人转变为反对疫苗的立场。对他们的信息分享行为的调查揭示了当他们改变立场时所指的用户和外部网站的类型。这些发现将有助于增加加强剂量和未来疫苗接种的覆盖率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信