Copyleft referring to GPL-3.0 was cited as a defense method in Chinese Intellectual Property Court in Beijing

Lucien Cheng-hsia Lin, Navia Shen
{"title":"Copyleft referring to GPL-3.0 was cited as a defense method in Chinese Intellectual Property Court in Beijing","authors":"Lucien Cheng-hsia Lin, Navia Shen","doi":"10.5033/IFOSSLR.V10I1.126","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the increasing use of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in the world, the licensing issues and disputes regarding such licenses have been litigated in various jurisdictions. In the past, these lawsuits were concentrated in Europe and the United States, but less so in the Asia Pacific region. However, in 2018, the specialized Intellectual Property Right Court in Beijing, China, acting as a court of first instance, issued a decision in a software copyright infringement lawsuit related to FOSS. The defendant chose to invoke the copyleft mechanism in the GNU General Public License 3.0 (GPL-3.0) license as a defense against claims of copyright infringement. Although the court did not directly interpret the GPL license at this stage, the decision strongly implies that the GPL and the other FOSS licenses can be treated as valid in China. Even so, quite a number of details regarding the use of the GPL in China still require clarification, included as to how the license can substantially be enforced and implemented.","PeriodicalId":359217,"journal":{"name":"International Free and Open Source Software Law - Review","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Free and Open Source Software Law - Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5033/IFOSSLR.V10I1.126","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

With the increasing use of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) in the world, the licensing issues and disputes regarding such licenses have been litigated in various jurisdictions. In the past, these lawsuits were concentrated in Europe and the United States, but less so in the Asia Pacific region. However, in 2018, the specialized Intellectual Property Right Court in Beijing, China, acting as a court of first instance, issued a decision in a software copyright infringement lawsuit related to FOSS. The defendant chose to invoke the copyleft mechanism in the GNU General Public License 3.0 (GPL-3.0) license as a defense against claims of copyright infringement. Although the court did not directly interpret the GPL license at this stage, the decision strongly implies that the GPL and the other FOSS licenses can be treated as valid in China. Even so, quite a number of details regarding the use of the GPL in China still require clarification, included as to how the license can substantially be enforced and implemented.
Copyleft在北京的中国知识产权法院被引用为GPL-3.0的辩护方法
随着自由和开放源码软件(FOSS)在世界范围内的使用越来越多,关于这些许可的许可问题和争议已经在不同的司法管辖区提起诉讼。过去,此类诉讼主要集中在欧洲和美国,而在亚太地区则较少。然而,2018年,中国北京知识产权专门法院作为一审法院,对一起涉及自由/开源软件的软件著作权侵权诉讼作出了判决。被告选择援引GNU通用公共许可证3.0 (GPL-3.0)许可证中的copyleft机制作为对版权侵权索赔的辩护。虽然法院在现阶段没有直接解释GPL许可证,但该决定强烈暗示GPL和其他自由/开源软件许可证在中国可以被视为有效。即便如此,关于在中国使用GPL的许多细节仍然需要澄清,包括如何在实质上强制执行和实施许可证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信