Enhancing Results of Ultra-High-Resolution Axial Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL-A Ultra) Inspection Data Utilizing Finite-Element Modeling (FEM) Simulations

E. Schneider, Johannes Spille, J. Fleming, Ziad Saad, Kevin Siggers
{"title":"Enhancing Results of Ultra-High-Resolution Axial Magnetic Flux Leakage (MFL-A Ultra) Inspection Data Utilizing Finite-Element Modeling (FEM) Simulations","authors":"E. Schneider, Johannes Spille, J. Fleming, Ziad Saad, Kevin Siggers","doi":"10.1115/ipc2022-87194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The standard evaluation methods for MFL-A inspections are based on simple calibration approaches that lead to stable results as long as the corrosion tends to be isolated and shallow. This paper presents a method suitable for complex and deep corrosion that utilizes FEM simulations on ultra-high resolution MFL-A data.\n It follows two main aspects: The first aspect is to learn from dig verifications by using laser scans of corrosion anomalies as a finite-element model to simulate the corresponding magnetic flux to confirm the magnetic flux measurement of the ILI tool. This way the simulation model is validated.\n The other aspect is to apply the achieved insights as a new depth sizing concept: the complete corrosion geometry as indicated by the ILI measurement is put into the validated FEM model to simulate the magnetic flux that should correspond to the one measured by the ILI tool.\n In this new sizing method the influence of complex corrosion is considered, as all surrounding features are part of the model. Several models are calculated in order to minimize the impact of ambiguity of depth results. This increases the accuracy and, ultimately, stabilize pipeline operators’ integrity assessments.\n In the big picture, novel approaches to MFL-A data interpretation, such as FEM, empower operators to make more informed decisions specific to their asset integrity management programs while reducing the costs, uncertainty and conservatism associated with these decisions.","PeriodicalId":264830,"journal":{"name":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","volume":"311 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 2: Pipeline and Facilities Integrity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/ipc2022-87194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The standard evaluation methods for MFL-A inspections are based on simple calibration approaches that lead to stable results as long as the corrosion tends to be isolated and shallow. This paper presents a method suitable for complex and deep corrosion that utilizes FEM simulations on ultra-high resolution MFL-A data. It follows two main aspects: The first aspect is to learn from dig verifications by using laser scans of corrosion anomalies as a finite-element model to simulate the corresponding magnetic flux to confirm the magnetic flux measurement of the ILI tool. This way the simulation model is validated. The other aspect is to apply the achieved insights as a new depth sizing concept: the complete corrosion geometry as indicated by the ILI measurement is put into the validated FEM model to simulate the magnetic flux that should correspond to the one measured by the ILI tool. In this new sizing method the influence of complex corrosion is considered, as all surrounding features are part of the model. Several models are calculated in order to minimize the impact of ambiguity of depth results. This increases the accuracy and, ultimately, stabilize pipeline operators’ integrity assessments. In the big picture, novel approaches to MFL-A data interpretation, such as FEM, empower operators to make more informed decisions specific to their asset integrity management programs while reducing the costs, uncertainty and conservatism associated with these decisions.
利用有限元建模(FEM)仿真增强超高分辨率轴向漏磁(MFL-A)检测数据的结果
MFL-A检测的标准评估方法是基于简单的校准方法,只要腐蚀倾向于隔离和浅,就会导致稳定的结果。本文提出了一种适用于复杂和深层腐蚀的方法,即利用有限元方法对超高分辨率MFL-A数据进行模拟。主要有两个方面:第一个方面是借鉴挖掘验证,利用激光扫描腐蚀异常作为有限元模型,模拟相应的磁通量,以确认ILI工具的磁通量测量结果。通过这种方式验证了仿真模型。另一方面是将获得的见解作为一种新的深度尺寸概念加以应用:将ILI测量所显示的完整腐蚀几何形状放入经过验证的FEM模型中,以模拟与ILI工具测量的磁通量相对应的磁通量。在这种新的施胶方法中,考虑了复杂腐蚀的影响,因为所有周围特征都是模型的一部分。为了最大限度地减少深度结果模糊性的影响,对多个模型进行了计算。这提高了准确性,并最终稳定了管道运营商的完整性评估。总体而言,MFL-A数据解释的新方法,如FEM,使作业者能够针对其资产完整性管理计划做出更明智的决策,同时降低与这些决策相关的成本、不确定性和保守性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信