The Lincoln Administration and Freedom of the Press in Civil War Maryland

M. Schearer
{"title":"The Lincoln Administration and Freedom of the Press in Civil War Maryland","authors":"M. Schearer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3908746","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Across all of American history, the accumulation of state power during times of war and national emergency has been the most destructive threat to freedom of the press. Clashes between the government and the press have occurred as early as the Quasi-War with France and recently as the War on Terror. Freedom of the press came under sustained assault during World War I and again during the Vietnam War. But perhaps the most outrageous violations of freedom of the press came during the Civil War. Although suppression of freedom of the press by the Lincoln Administration took place across a broad swath of the Union, the battle between government and press was particularly acute in border states because of their slave populations and secessionist sentiments. In particular, Maryland presented a complex challenge to President Lincoln during the Civil War. The people of the slaveholding state were sympathetic to the South, but its economy was becoming increasingly integrated with the industrial North. Most importantly, Maryland's strategic location placed it on three sides of Washington, D.C.; and its secession would leave the national capital completely surrounded by the Confederacy. Deciding that the loss of the capital would be intolerable to the war effort, the Lincoln administration suspended the writ of habeas corpus as part of a larger, deliberate campaign to keep Maryland in the Union. The suspension was the foundation upon which the administration suppressed freedom of the press in Maryland. This strategy involved imprisonment without trial of journalists and publishers, seizing their property, deportation beyond the Federal lines, shuttering of their newspapers, and barring their publications from using the mails. These events represented among the most egregious violations of civil liberties in American history.","PeriodicalId":254768,"journal":{"name":"Legal History eJournal","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal History eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3908746","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Across all of American history, the accumulation of state power during times of war and national emergency has been the most destructive threat to freedom of the press. Clashes between the government and the press have occurred as early as the Quasi-War with France and recently as the War on Terror. Freedom of the press came under sustained assault during World War I and again during the Vietnam War. But perhaps the most outrageous violations of freedom of the press came during the Civil War. Although suppression of freedom of the press by the Lincoln Administration took place across a broad swath of the Union, the battle between government and press was particularly acute in border states because of their slave populations and secessionist sentiments. In particular, Maryland presented a complex challenge to President Lincoln during the Civil War. The people of the slaveholding state were sympathetic to the South, but its economy was becoming increasingly integrated with the industrial North. Most importantly, Maryland's strategic location placed it on three sides of Washington, D.C.; and its secession would leave the national capital completely surrounded by the Confederacy. Deciding that the loss of the capital would be intolerable to the war effort, the Lincoln administration suspended the writ of habeas corpus as part of a larger, deliberate campaign to keep Maryland in the Union. The suspension was the foundation upon which the administration suppressed freedom of the press in Maryland. This strategy involved imprisonment without trial of journalists and publishers, seizing their property, deportation beyond the Federal lines, shuttering of their newspapers, and barring their publications from using the mails. These events represented among the most egregious violations of civil liberties in American history.
林肯政府和内战时期马里兰州的新闻自由
纵观美国历史,在战争和国家紧急状态时期,国家权力的积累一直是对新闻自由最具破坏性的威胁。早在对法准战争时期和最近的反恐战争时期,政府和媒体之间的矛盾就已经发生过。在第一次世界大战和越南战争期间,新闻自由受到了持续的攻击。但对新闻自由最严重的侵犯可能发生在南北战争期间。尽管林肯政府对新闻自由的压制发生在联邦的大片地区,但政府与媒体之间的斗争在边境各州尤其激烈,因为那里有奴隶人口和分离主义情绪。特别是,在南北战争期间,马里兰州对林肯总统提出了一个复杂的挑战。蓄奴州的人民同情南方,但其经济与工业发达的北方日益融合。最重要的是,马里兰州的战略位置使它在华盛顿特区的三面;它的脱离将使首都完全被南部邦联包围。林肯政府认为失去首都对战争来说是无法容忍的,于是暂停了人身保护令,作为一项更大的、深思熟虑的运动的一部分,以使马里兰州留在联邦。这一禁令是政府压制马里兰州新闻自由的基础。这一策略包括不经审判就监禁记者和出版商,没收他们的财产,将他们驱逐出联邦边界,关闭他们的报纸,并禁止他们的出版物使用邮件。这些事件是美国历史上对公民自由最严重的侵犯。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信