Cultural Value as Practice: Seeing Future Directions, Looking Back at the AHRC Cultural Value Project

Patrycja Kaszynska
{"title":"Cultural Value as Practice: Seeing Future Directions, Looking Back at the AHRC Cultural Value Project","authors":"Patrycja Kaszynska","doi":"10.1108/978-1-78973-515-420211009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter introduces the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) Cultural Value Project and the ensuing legacy work. It suggests that this work has resulted in the re-positioning of the field of enquiry into cultural value by shifting attention away from policy constructs and towards lived experiences; away from measuring the outcomes of cultural participation and towards understanding the process of engagement. The challenge still remaining is to develop an empirically grounded pragmatist account of cultural value as a form of practice – a situated interface of agents, actions and structures taking place in an institutionalised and materially circumscribed environment. Reconceiving cultural value in these terms will have profound methodological implications, not least the challenge of finding methodologies appropriate to its analysis within the realm of historically and geographically variable relations and structures. It is, however, a challenge worth taking. The proposed shift, it is suggested, will provide a way of addressing some long-standing ‘problems’ arising in relation to cultural value: the separation of conditions and consciousness; the overemphasis on the cognitive at the cost of the bodily; the separation between ‘the best and the brightest’ and the ‘everyday’ conceptions of culture. The proposed approach may also drive the refinement of flat(ter)-ontology methodologies which neither succumb to methodological individualism nor overemphasise methodological structuralism.","PeriodicalId":319460,"journal":{"name":"Exploring Cultural Value","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploring Cultural Value","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/978-1-78973-515-420211009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This chapter introduces the Arts and Humanities Research Council (AHRC) Cultural Value Project and the ensuing legacy work. It suggests that this work has resulted in the re-positioning of the field of enquiry into cultural value by shifting attention away from policy constructs and towards lived experiences; away from measuring the outcomes of cultural participation and towards understanding the process of engagement. The challenge still remaining is to develop an empirically grounded pragmatist account of cultural value as a form of practice – a situated interface of agents, actions and structures taking place in an institutionalised and materially circumscribed environment. Reconceiving cultural value in these terms will have profound methodological implications, not least the challenge of finding methodologies appropriate to its analysis within the realm of historically and geographically variable relations and structures. It is, however, a challenge worth taking. The proposed shift, it is suggested, will provide a way of addressing some long-standing ‘problems’ arising in relation to cultural value: the separation of conditions and consciousness; the overemphasis on the cognitive at the cost of the bodily; the separation between ‘the best and the brightest’ and the ‘everyday’ conceptions of culture. The proposed approach may also drive the refinement of flat(ter)-ontology methodologies which neither succumb to methodological individualism nor overemphasise methodological structuralism.
文化价值作为实践:展望未来,回顾AHRC文化价值计划
本章介绍艺术与人文研究委员会(AHRC)的文化价值计划和随之而来的遗产工作。它表明,这项工作通过将注意力从政策结构转移到生活经验,导致了对文化价值调查领域的重新定位;从衡量文化参与的结果转向理解参与的过程。仍然存在的挑战是发展一种基于经验的实用主义的文化价值解释,作为一种实践形式-在制度化和物质受限的环境中发生的代理人,行动和结构的定位界面。用这些术语重新认识文化价值将具有深刻的方法论意义,尤其是在历史和地理上可变的关系和结构范围内寻找适合其分析的方法的挑战。然而,这是一个值得尝试的挑战。有人建议,拟议的转变将提供一种解决与文化价值有关的一些长期存在的“问题”的方法:条件和意识的分离;以身体为代价过分强调认知;“最好的和最聪明的”和“日常的”文化概念之间的分离。所提出的方法也可能推动平面(ter)本体方法的改进,这种方法既不屈服于方法论的个人主义,也不过分强调方法论的结构主义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信