CD-ROM periodical indexes: better evaluation necessary

M. Goldberg
{"title":"CD-ROM periodical indexes: better evaluation necessary","authors":"M. Goldberg","doi":"10.3828/indexer.1992.18.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nLibrary literature for has some time been replete with articles extolling the virtues of various CDROM periodical indexes. Most of these articles do not contain any definitive, methodical studies of the indexes; the assessment is usually of the kind, ‘we obtained a free trial of the product, many of the journals we received were indexed, and the patrons loved it’. There is a need to look at these powerful tools more closely. This article calls for better evaluation and highlights those studies that included in-depth examinations of the indexes, the use of computers, etc. The more complete an evaluation, the better the librarians will understand which index to purchase and where that index fits into library operations.","PeriodicalId":431042,"journal":{"name":"The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 18, Issue 1","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indexer: The International Journal of Indexing: Volume 18, Issue 1","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1992.18.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Library literature for has some time been replete with articles extolling the virtues of various CDROM periodical indexes. Most of these articles do not contain any definitive, methodical studies of the indexes; the assessment is usually of the kind, ‘we obtained a free trial of the product, many of the journals we received were indexed, and the patrons loved it’. There is a need to look at these powerful tools more closely. This article calls for better evaluation and highlights those studies that included in-depth examinations of the indexes, the use of computers, etc. The more complete an evaluation, the better the librarians will understand which index to purchase and where that index fits into library operations.
光盘期刊索引:更好的评价是必要的
一段时间以来,图书馆文献中充斥着歌颂各种CDROM期刊索引优点的文章。这些文章中的大多数都没有对指数进行任何明确的、系统的研究;评估通常是这样的,“我们获得了产品的免费试用,我们收到的许多期刊都被索引了,赞助人很喜欢它”。有必要更仔细地研究这些强大的工具。本文呼吁进行更好的评估,并强调了那些包括对索引、计算机使用等进行深入检查的研究。评估越完整,图书馆员就越能理解应该购买哪个索引,以及索引在图书馆运营中的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信