Flexible update management in peer-to-peer database systems

D. Vecchio, S. Son
{"title":"Flexible update management in peer-to-peer database systems","authors":"D. Vecchio, S. Son","doi":"10.1109/IDEAS.2005.31","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Promising the combination of dynamic configuration, scalability and redundancy, peer-to-peer (P2P) networks have garnered tremendous interest lately. Before long, this interest extended to P2P sharing of disparate databases. While many have explored the data placement and coordination difficulties involved in such systems, far fewer have examined the unique challenges involved in updating P2P-distributed data items. In addressing that problem, we present an adapted version of the traditional quorum-consensus approach that is better suited to the P2P domain. Further, we explore the many tradeoffs introduced by this flexible update scheme, especially in the areas of data freshness, data availability, access latency and redundancy. Our simulation results demonstrate that if the data replication or quorum levels are sufficiently high it is possible to achieve a near-zero probability of stale data access. However, since more nodes are involved in quorum-building, the cost of high data confidence is slower access times. Keeping with the flexibility theme, our philosophy is to leave control in the hands of individual peers, letting them choose parameters and tradeoff performance to meet their unique needs.","PeriodicalId":357591,"journal":{"name":"9th International Database Engineering & Application Symposium (IDEAS'05)","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"9th International Database Engineering & Application Symposium (IDEAS'05)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IDEAS.2005.31","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

Abstract

Promising the combination of dynamic configuration, scalability and redundancy, peer-to-peer (P2P) networks have garnered tremendous interest lately. Before long, this interest extended to P2P sharing of disparate databases. While many have explored the data placement and coordination difficulties involved in such systems, far fewer have examined the unique challenges involved in updating P2P-distributed data items. In addressing that problem, we present an adapted version of the traditional quorum-consensus approach that is better suited to the P2P domain. Further, we explore the many tradeoffs introduced by this flexible update scheme, especially in the areas of data freshness, data availability, access latency and redundancy. Our simulation results demonstrate that if the data replication or quorum levels are sufficiently high it is possible to achieve a near-zero probability of stale data access. However, since more nodes are involved in quorum-building, the cost of high data confidence is slower access times. Keeping with the flexibility theme, our philosophy is to leave control in the hands of individual peers, letting them choose parameters and tradeoff performance to meet their unique needs.
灵活的对等数据库系统更新管理
点对点(P2P)网络以其动态配置、可伸缩性和冗余的特性而备受关注。不久之后,这种兴趣扩展到不同数据库的P2P共享。虽然许多人已经探索了此类系统中涉及的数据放置和协调困难,但很少有人研究了更新p2p分布式数据项所涉及的独特挑战。为了解决这个问题,我们提出了一种更适合P2P领域的传统群体共识方法的改编版本。此外,我们还探讨了这种灵活的更新方案所带来的许多权衡,特别是在数据新鲜度、数据可用性、访问延迟和冗余方面。我们的模拟结果表明,如果数据复制或仲裁级别足够高,就有可能实现近乎零的陈旧数据访问概率。然而,由于更多的节点参与到群体构建中,高数据置信度的代价是更慢的访问时间。与灵活性主题保持一致,我们的理念是将控制权交给个体同行,让他们选择参数并权衡性能以满足他们独特的需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信