Waveform trade-offs for medium PRF air-to-air radar

R. Nevin
{"title":"Waveform trade-offs for medium PRF air-to-air radar","authors":"R. Nevin","doi":"10.1109/NRC.1988.10947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author determines what drives selection of the mean pulse repetition frequency (PRF) for use in current air-to-air radar system design, and what points these factors become critical. Data are presented that indicate that the relationship between velocity blanking and PRF is the important factor; approximate minimum PRF values for the cases considered are provided. Selection of the average PRF and the transmitted pulse width control the pattern of blind zones in unambiguous range-Doppler space. In addition, selection of the compressed pulse width affects losses, signal-to-clutter ratio, and false alarm opportunities, as well as the ability to resolve range ambiguity and reject ghosts. The present study was also used to determine the effect of ground moving target (GMT) rejection by blanking of the unambiguous Doppler signal. This was shown to range from 0.2 to 1.5 dB. the effect of resolving Doppler ambiguity before declaring a target was shown to be about 1 dB. The effect of changes in range resolution on target detection was shown to be small. These last points show tradeoffs between processing complexity and increased performance. Velocity ambiguity resolution and reduced compressed pulse width cause predictable increases in processing requirements. GMT rejection based on resolved Doppler cause a less well-defined increase in the postprocessor workload.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":237192,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE National Radar Conference","volume":"106 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 1988 IEEE National Radar Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NRC.1988.10947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The author determines what drives selection of the mean pulse repetition frequency (PRF) for use in current air-to-air radar system design, and what points these factors become critical. Data are presented that indicate that the relationship between velocity blanking and PRF is the important factor; approximate minimum PRF values for the cases considered are provided. Selection of the average PRF and the transmitted pulse width control the pattern of blind zones in unambiguous range-Doppler space. In addition, selection of the compressed pulse width affects losses, signal-to-clutter ratio, and false alarm opportunities, as well as the ability to resolve range ambiguity and reject ghosts. The present study was also used to determine the effect of ground moving target (GMT) rejection by blanking of the unambiguous Doppler signal. This was shown to range from 0.2 to 1.5 dB. the effect of resolving Doppler ambiguity before declaring a target was shown to be about 1 dB. The effect of changes in range resolution on target detection was shown to be small. These last points show tradeoffs between processing complexity and increased performance. Velocity ambiguity resolution and reduced compressed pulse width cause predictable increases in processing requirements. GMT rejection based on resolved Doppler cause a less well-defined increase in the postprocessor workload.<>
中PRF空对空雷达的波形权衡
作者确定了当前空对空雷达系统设计中使用的平均脉冲重复频率(PRF)的选择驱动因素,以及这些因素在哪些方面变得至关重要。给出的数据表明,速度消隐与PRF之间的关系是重要的影响因素;提供了所考虑的情况的近似最小PRF值。平均PRF和发射脉宽的选择控制了无二义距离-多普勒空间中盲区的方向。此外,压缩脉冲宽度的选择会影响损失、信杂比和虚警机会,以及解决距离模糊和拒绝幽灵的能力。本研究还用于确定通过消隐明确多普勒信号来抑制地面移动目标(GMT)的效果。其范围为0.2至1.5 dB。在宣布目标之前解决多普勒模糊的效果约为1db。距离分辨率的变化对目标检测的影响很小。最后几点显示了处理复杂性和提高性能之间的权衡。速度模糊度分辨率和压缩脉冲宽度的降低会导致处理需求的增加。基于分辨多普勒的GMT拒绝导致后处理器工作量的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信