PARTICIPATION OF THIRD PARTIES WHO DO NOT DECLARE INDEPENDENT CLAIMS ON THE SUBJECT OF A DISPUTE, IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS

Roksolana Lemyk
{"title":"PARTICIPATION OF THIRD PARTIES WHO DO NOT DECLARE INDEPENDENT CLAIMS ON THE SUBJECT OF A DISPUTE, IN CIVIL PROCEEDINGS","authors":"Roksolana Lemyk","doi":"10.30970/vla.2023.76.151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The third parties who do not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute are the subjects of civil procedural legal relations, who take part in a civil case in order to protect their interests. A third party who does not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute is interested in the outcome of the consideration of the civil case between the parties, as the court's decision may affect its rights or obligations to one of the parties. The main characteristic feature that distinguishes third parties who do not declare independent claims from other participants of the case is the nature of their interest in the case. Their interest is not in the subject of dispute, but in the outcome of the case, as the decision in the case can be on their mutual relations with one of the parties. Therefore, such interest is procedural in content. The court may not impose on third parties who do not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute any material and legal obligations, or establish or defend their rights, that is, make a decision or ruling on the rights or obligations of these third parties. The third party may enter the case on their own initiative, and also be involved in the case on the motion of the participants of the case or the initiative of the court. The content of the statement from a third party about its involvement in the case is not provided by law, but as it follows from the provisions of part 4 of Art. 53 the CPC of Ukraine, in such a statement it is necessary to specify on which grounds it is necessary to involve such a third person in the case. The plaintiff, who initiated the involvement of a third party in the case, after the court’s satisfaction of his petition, in fact, cannot refuse the participation of such person in the case. Analyzing the expediency of participation of third parties in the case, the court should take into account the following circumstances, the presence of which is the basis of involvement of third parties who do not declare independent claims: – the existence of material-legal relations between a third party and one of the parties (labor, contractual, family); – these material and legal relations arise (are predominant) from the procedural relations that have formed between the plaintiff and the defendant in the case for the subject of the dispute; – the probability of a dispute on the law of civil law between a third party and one of the parties arising from these relations. The third person, who does not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute, belongs to the number of participants of the case, and therefore is assigned to the whole set of procedural rights and obligations of the given type of subjects of procedural legal relations, provided by the Article. 43 CPC of Ukraine. Since such persons have no property interests in their case, there are no claim management rights, respectively, which would influence the commencement or termination of proceedings. For example, such third parties may not bring before the court the question of transfer of the case under established jurisdiction, since the closure of the case may be brought before the court by the plaintiff by submitting the respective application and deciding on transfer of the case under established jurisdiction is decided by the court on application of the plaintiff in the case. In the process of evidence the third party acts independently in accordance with their own interests. Performance or non-performance of certain procedural actions is based on the principle of optionality and all depends on the third parties themselves.","PeriodicalId":139620,"journal":{"name":"Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law","volume":"35 18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnyk of the Lviv University. Series Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30970/vla.2023.76.151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The third parties who do not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute are the subjects of civil procedural legal relations, who take part in a civil case in order to protect their interests. A third party who does not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute is interested in the outcome of the consideration of the civil case between the parties, as the court's decision may affect its rights or obligations to one of the parties. The main characteristic feature that distinguishes third parties who do not declare independent claims from other participants of the case is the nature of their interest in the case. Their interest is not in the subject of dispute, but in the outcome of the case, as the decision in the case can be on their mutual relations with one of the parties. Therefore, such interest is procedural in content. The court may not impose on third parties who do not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute any material and legal obligations, or establish or defend their rights, that is, make a decision or ruling on the rights or obligations of these third parties. The third party may enter the case on their own initiative, and also be involved in the case on the motion of the participants of the case or the initiative of the court. The content of the statement from a third party about its involvement in the case is not provided by law, but as it follows from the provisions of part 4 of Art. 53 the CPC of Ukraine, in such a statement it is necessary to specify on which grounds it is necessary to involve such a third person in the case. The plaintiff, who initiated the involvement of a third party in the case, after the court’s satisfaction of his petition, in fact, cannot refuse the participation of such person in the case. Analyzing the expediency of participation of third parties in the case, the court should take into account the following circumstances, the presence of which is the basis of involvement of third parties who do not declare independent claims: – the existence of material-legal relations between a third party and one of the parties (labor, contractual, family); – these material and legal relations arise (are predominant) from the procedural relations that have formed between the plaintiff and the defendant in the case for the subject of the dispute; – the probability of a dispute on the law of civil law between a third party and one of the parties arising from these relations. The third person, who does not declare independent claims on the subject of a dispute, belongs to the number of participants of the case, and therefore is assigned to the whole set of procedural rights and obligations of the given type of subjects of procedural legal relations, provided by the Article. 43 CPC of Ukraine. Since such persons have no property interests in their case, there are no claim management rights, respectively, which would influence the commencement or termination of proceedings. For example, such third parties may not bring before the court the question of transfer of the case under established jurisdiction, since the closure of the case may be brought before the court by the plaintiff by submitting the respective application and deciding on transfer of the case under established jurisdiction is decided by the court on application of the plaintiff in the case. In the process of evidence the third party acts independently in accordance with their own interests. Performance or non-performance of certain procedural actions is based on the principle of optionality and all depends on the third parties themselves.
在民事诉讼中,未就争议主题提出独立索赔的第三方的参与
没有对争议主体提出独立主张的第三人是民事诉讼法律关系的主体,他们为了保护自己的利益而参与民事诉讼。未就争议主题提出独立索赔的第三方对双方之间民事案件的审理结果感兴趣,因为法院的裁决可能影响其对一方当事人的权利或义务。区分不声明独立权利要求的第三方与案件其他参与人的主要特征是其在案件中利益的性质。他们的利益不在于争议的主题,而在于案件的结果,因为案件的决定可能取决于他们与其中一方的相互关系。因此,这种兴趣在内容上具有程序性。对于未对争议主体提出独立索赔的第三方,法院不得强制其承担任何重大和法律义务,也不得确立或维护其权利,即不得对这些第三方的权利或义务作出决定或裁定。第三人可以主动入案,也可以根据参与人的请求或者法院的主动入案。法律没有规定第三方关于其参与案件的陈述的内容,但根据乌克兰共产党第53条第4部分的规定,在这种陈述中有必要具体说明有哪些理由需要使该第三方参与案件。原告在法院受理其诉讼请求后,主动要求第三人参与诉讼,实际上不能拒绝第三人参与诉讼。在分析第三方参与案件的权宜之计时,法院应考虑以下情况,这些情况的存在是第三方不声明独立索赔的基础:-第三方与一方当事人(劳动、合同、家庭)之间存在物质法律关系;-这些物质和法律关系产生于(占主导地位的)诉讼关系,这些诉讼关系是原告和被告在案件中就争议的主题所形成的;-第三方与其中一方之间因这些关系而发生民事法律纠纷的可能性。不就争端主体提出独立要求的第三人属于案件的参与人,因此被分配到乌克兰《程序性法律关系》第43条所规定的特定类型的程序法律关系主体的一整套程序权利和义务。由于这些人在其案件中没有财产利益,因此没有分别的索赔管理权,这将影响诉讼的开始或终止。例如,这些第三方可能不会向法院提出在既定管辖权下转移案件的问题,因为原告可以通过提交各自的申请向法院提出结案,而在既定管辖权下是否转移案件的决定是由法院根据案件中原告的申请作出的。在举证过程中,第三方根据自己的利益独立行事。某些程序性诉讼的履行或不履行基于可选性原则,完全取决于第三方自身。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信