Classifying Change Types for Qualifying Change Couplings

B. Fluri, H. Gall
{"title":"Classifying Change Types for Qualifying Change Couplings","authors":"B. Fluri, H. Gall","doi":"10.1109/ICPC.2006.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current change history analysis approaches rely on information provided by versioning systems such as CVS. Therefore, changes are not related to particular source code entities such as classes or methods but rather to text lines added and/or removed. For analyzing whether some change coupling between source code entities is significant or only minor textual adjustments have been checked in, it is essential to reflect the changes to the source code entities. We have developed an approach for analyzing and classifying change types based on code revisions. We can differentiate between several types of changes on the method or class level and assess their significance in terms of the impact of the change types on other source code entities and whether a change may be functionality-modifying or functionality-preserving. We applied our change taxonomy to a case study and found out that in many cases large numbers of lines added and/or deleted are not accompanied by significant changes but small textual adaptations (such as indentation, etc.). Furthermore, our approach allows us to relate all change couplings to the significance of the identified change types. As a result, change couplings between code entities can be qualified and less relevant couplings can be filtered out","PeriodicalId":377450,"journal":{"name":"14th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC'06)","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-06-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"186","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"14th IEEE International Conference on Program Comprehension (ICPC'06)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPC.2006.16","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 186

Abstract

Current change history analysis approaches rely on information provided by versioning systems such as CVS. Therefore, changes are not related to particular source code entities such as classes or methods but rather to text lines added and/or removed. For analyzing whether some change coupling between source code entities is significant or only minor textual adjustments have been checked in, it is essential to reflect the changes to the source code entities. We have developed an approach for analyzing and classifying change types based on code revisions. We can differentiate between several types of changes on the method or class level and assess their significance in terms of the impact of the change types on other source code entities and whether a change may be functionality-modifying or functionality-preserving. We applied our change taxonomy to a case study and found out that in many cases large numbers of lines added and/or deleted are not accompanied by significant changes but small textual adaptations (such as indentation, etc.). Furthermore, our approach allows us to relate all change couplings to the significance of the identified change types. As a result, change couplings between code entities can be qualified and less relevant couplings can be filtered out
对变更类型进行分类以限定变更耦合
当前的变更历史分析方法依赖于版本控制系统(如CVS)提供的信息。因此,更改与特定的源代码实体(如类或方法)无关,而是与添加和/或删除的文本行有关。为了分析源代码实体之间的一些耦合变化是重要的,还是只签入了较小的文本调整,将这些变化反映到源代码实体中是很重要的。我们已经开发了一种基于代码修订分析和分类变更类型的方法。我们可以在方法或类级别上区分几种类型的更改,并根据更改类型对其他源代码实体的影响来评估它们的重要性,以及更改是修改功能还是保留功能。我们将更改分类法应用到一个案例研究中,发现在许多情况下,大量添加和/或删除的行并没有伴随着重大的更改,而是伴随着少量的文本调整(例如缩进等)。此外,我们的方法允许我们将所有的变更耦合与确定的变更类型的重要性联系起来。因此,代码实体之间的更改耦合可以被限定,而不太相关的耦合可以被过滤掉
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信