The Significance of “Seikatsu Tsuzurikata” in a Global Age: Contextualizing an Educational Discourse of Liberation, “Intent Observations” and De-centering

P. Shorb
{"title":"The Significance of “Seikatsu Tsuzurikata” in a Global Age: Contextualizing an Educational Discourse of Liberation, “Intent Observations” and De-centering","authors":"P. Shorb","doi":"10.7571/esjkyoiku.14.53","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Building upon the recent English-language scholarship (Kawaji, 2017, Miyazawa, 2015; Hiraoka, 2011) on the Japanese pedagogy movement of seikatsu tsuzurikata (“daily life writing,” hereafter referred to as DLW), this essay seeks to locate its signifi cance within a broader global context. It is as much a polemic for why DLW should be better known outside of Japanese academic circles as it is meant to be a dispassionate, historical analysis of an education movement per se. The fact that such a large-scale, politically radical grassroots education movement as DLW took place within Japan’s highly technocratic and centralized educational tradition is intrinsically interesting. Greater international awareness of DLW can thus serve as a valuable touchstone for a broader reconsideration of 21 century education change. This essay highlights three ways that DLW complicates understandings of modern Japanese education as well as education development more generally. First, the spread of DLW in the 1930s reminds us that discourses of liberation and socio-economic empowerment proved surprisingly enduring, even during the supposed “dark-valley” era of prewar Japan. Second, the essay explores how DLW’s critical pedagogy arose from a hermeneutical skepticism of “intent observations” that emerged from a humanistic (particularly Diltheyan) philosophical tradition distinct from the progressive, Anglo-American discourses that have come to dominate contemporary Japanese education (Takayama, 2011). Finally, this paper explores the subversive ways DLW de-centers conventional understandings of educational change, by noting how previously marginalized groups (in terms of geography, class and education status) generated compelling critiques of dominant education discourses. DLW’s similarities with later, better-known, movements of critical pedagogy overseas suggest a globalized discourse of educational iconoclasm that is longer-lived and more geographically varied than is often recognized. To give overseas readers a better sense of DLW ideology, this essay includes extended quotes from key DLW writers and documents. The Signifi cance of “Seikatsu Tsuzurikata” in a Global Age: Contextualizing an Educational Discourse of Liberation, “Intent Observations” and De-centering","PeriodicalId":205276,"journal":{"name":"Educational Studies in Japan","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Educational Studies in Japan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7571/esjkyoiku.14.53","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Building upon the recent English-language scholarship (Kawaji, 2017, Miyazawa, 2015; Hiraoka, 2011) on the Japanese pedagogy movement of seikatsu tsuzurikata (“daily life writing,” hereafter referred to as DLW), this essay seeks to locate its signifi cance within a broader global context. It is as much a polemic for why DLW should be better known outside of Japanese academic circles as it is meant to be a dispassionate, historical analysis of an education movement per se. The fact that such a large-scale, politically radical grassroots education movement as DLW took place within Japan’s highly technocratic and centralized educational tradition is intrinsically interesting. Greater international awareness of DLW can thus serve as a valuable touchstone for a broader reconsideration of 21 century education change. This essay highlights three ways that DLW complicates understandings of modern Japanese education as well as education development more generally. First, the spread of DLW in the 1930s reminds us that discourses of liberation and socio-economic empowerment proved surprisingly enduring, even during the supposed “dark-valley” era of prewar Japan. Second, the essay explores how DLW’s critical pedagogy arose from a hermeneutical skepticism of “intent observations” that emerged from a humanistic (particularly Diltheyan) philosophical tradition distinct from the progressive, Anglo-American discourses that have come to dominate contemporary Japanese education (Takayama, 2011). Finally, this paper explores the subversive ways DLW de-centers conventional understandings of educational change, by noting how previously marginalized groups (in terms of geography, class and education status) generated compelling critiques of dominant education discourses. DLW’s similarities with later, better-known, movements of critical pedagogy overseas suggest a globalized discourse of educational iconoclasm that is longer-lived and more geographically varied than is often recognized. To give overseas readers a better sense of DLW ideology, this essay includes extended quotes from key DLW writers and documents. The Signifi cance of “Seikatsu Tsuzurikata” in a Global Age: Contextualizing an Educational Discourse of Liberation, “Intent Observations” and De-centering
全球化时代“tsuzuriata”的意义:解放教育话语的语境化、“意图观察”与“去中心”
基于最近的英语奖学金(Kawaji, 2017; Miyazawa, 2015;Hiraoka, 2011)关于日本“日常生活写作”(seikatsu tsuzurikata,以下简称DLW)的教育学运动,本文试图在更广泛的全球背景下定位其意义。这本书意在对教育运动本身进行冷静的历史分析,同时也在争论为什么DLW应该在日本学术界之外得到更多的关注。像DLW这样的大规模、政治激进的基层教育运动发生在日本高度技术官僚和中央集权的教育传统中,这一事实本身就很有趣。因此,提高国际上对DLW的认识可以作为对21世纪教育变革进行更广泛反思的有价值的试金石。这篇文章强调了DLW使人们对现代日本教育以及更普遍的教育发展的理解复杂化的三个方面。首先,DLW在20世纪30年代的传播提醒我们,解放和社会经济赋权的话语出人意料地持久,即使是在战前日本所谓的“黑暗谷”时代。其次,本文探讨了DLW的批判教学法是如何从一种对“意图观察”的解释学怀疑主义中产生的,这种怀疑主义来自于一种人文主义(尤其是狄尔泰扬)的哲学传统,与已经主导当代日本教育的进步的英美话语不同(Takayama, 2011)。最后,本文通过指出以前被边缘化的群体(在地理、阶级和教育地位方面)如何对主流教育话语产生令人信服的批评,探讨了DLW颠覆性地去中心化对教育变革的传统理解。DLW与后来更为人所知的海外批判教育学运动的相似之处表明,一种全球化的教育偶像破坏话语比人们通常认识到的更持久,更具有地域多样性。为了让海外读者更好地了解DLW的思想,本文包括了DLW主要作者和文件的延伸引用。全球化时代“光胜”的意义:解放教育话语的语境化、“意图观察”与“去中心”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信