Qualitative Analysis of Medical Record Documents in Inpatient Patients in the Public Health Center

Sri Wahyuningsih Nugraheni, S Kumar, Laila Rizky Azizah
{"title":"Qualitative Analysis of Medical Record Documents in Inpatient Patients in the Public Health Center","authors":"Sri Wahyuningsih Nugraheni, S Kumar, Laila Rizky Azizah","doi":"10.37287/picnhs.v4i1.1718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The community health center is one of the first level health service facilities that is required to maintain medical records. Medical record is a document that contains patient identity data, examinations, treatment, actions, and other services that have been given to patients. Based on the Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2022 concerning medical records, Article 18 states that medical records are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Qualitative analysis aims to ensure complete and accurate medical record data. Objective: The research objective was to determine the completeness and consistency of medical records based on six reviews. Method: This type of research is descriptive research with a retrospective approach. The population is 432 inpatient medical record documents, sample 81 inpatient medical record documents using simple random sampling technique. Collecting data using interviews and observation. Data processing, data presentation and data analysis were carried out on quantitative data and qualitative data in a non-statistical or descriptive manner in tabular and textular forms.    Results: The results of the study: 1) review of the completeness and consistency of diagnosis by 71 (88%), 2) review of the consistency of recording diagnoses by 80 (99%), 3) review of things done during care and treatment by 81 (100%), 4 ) review of 8 forms of informed consent by 8 (100%), 5) review of recording techniques by 71 (88%), and 6) review of potential compensation matters by 66 (81%).   Conclusions: The results of a qualitative analysis of medical record documents based on the six highest reviews were on the review of recording things that were done during care and treatment as well as the review of complete informed consent, namely 81 (100%), while the lowest review was on the review of things that had the potential for compensation, namely 66 (81 %). The researcher's suggestion to improve the completeness and consistency is to increase the commitment of Caring Professionals (doctors, midwives, nurses, medical recorders) regarding the importance of the completeness and consistency of medical records and the implementation of comprehensive and continuous quantitative and qualitative analyzes.","PeriodicalId":254099,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Nursing and Health Sciences","volume":"291 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International Conference on Nursing and Health Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37287/picnhs.v4i1.1718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The community health center is one of the first level health service facilities that is required to maintain medical records. Medical record is a document that contains patient identity data, examinations, treatment, actions, and other services that have been given to patients. Based on the Regulation of the Minister of Health of the Republic of Indonesia Number 24 of 2022 concerning medical records, Article 18 states that medical records are analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Qualitative analysis aims to ensure complete and accurate medical record data. Objective: The research objective was to determine the completeness and consistency of medical records based on six reviews. Method: This type of research is descriptive research with a retrospective approach. The population is 432 inpatient medical record documents, sample 81 inpatient medical record documents using simple random sampling technique. Collecting data using interviews and observation. Data processing, data presentation and data analysis were carried out on quantitative data and qualitative data in a non-statistical or descriptive manner in tabular and textular forms.    Results: The results of the study: 1) review of the completeness and consistency of diagnosis by 71 (88%), 2) review of the consistency of recording diagnoses by 80 (99%), 3) review of things done during care and treatment by 81 (100%), 4 ) review of 8 forms of informed consent by 8 (100%), 5) review of recording techniques by 71 (88%), and 6) review of potential compensation matters by 66 (81%).   Conclusions: The results of a qualitative analysis of medical record documents based on the six highest reviews were on the review of recording things that were done during care and treatment as well as the review of complete informed consent, namely 81 (100%), while the lowest review was on the review of things that had the potential for compensation, namely 66 (81 %). The researcher's suggestion to improve the completeness and consistency is to increase the commitment of Caring Professionals (doctors, midwives, nurses, medical recorders) regarding the importance of the completeness and consistency of medical records and the implementation of comprehensive and continuous quantitative and qualitative analyzes.
公共卫生中心住院病人病案文件的定性分析
社区卫生中心是一级卫生服务机构之一,需要保存医疗记录。医疗记录是包含患者身份数据、检查、治疗、操作和向患者提供的其他服务的文档。根据印度尼西亚共和国卫生部长关于医疗记录的2022年第24号条例,第18条规定对医疗记录进行定量和定性分析。定性分析的目的是保证病历数据的完整和准确。目的:研究目的是通过六篇综述来确定病历的完整性和一致性。方法:这类研究采用回顾性方法进行描述性研究。人口为432例住院病历文件,采用简单随机抽样技术抽取81例住院病历文件。通过访谈和观察收集数据。以非统计或描述性的方式,以表格和文本形式对定量数据和定性数据进行数据处理、数据呈现和数据分析。结果:研究结果:1)诊断的完整性和一致性评价71人(88%),2)记录诊断的一致性评价80人(99%),3)护理和治疗过程中所做的事情评价81人(100%),4)8份知情同意书评价8人(100%),5)记录技术评价71人(88%),6)潜在补偿事项评价66人(81%)。结论:基于病历文件定性分析的6项最高评价是对护理和治疗期间所做的记录事项的审查以及完全知情同意的审查,即81(100%),而最低评价是对有补偿潜力的事项的审查,即66(81%)。提高完整性和一致性的建议是增加护理专业人员(医生,助产士,护士,医疗记录员)对病历完整性和一致性的重要性的承诺,并实施全面和连续的定量和定性分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信