Mathematics teacher educators’ noticing of pedagogical content knowledge on hierarchical classification of quadrilateral

R. Ekawati, A. W. Kohar, T. Siswono, A. Lukito, Kai-Lin Yang, K. Nisa'
{"title":"Mathematics teacher educators’ noticing of pedagogical content knowledge on hierarchical classification of quadrilateral","authors":"R. Ekawati, A. W. Kohar, T. Siswono, A. Lukito, Kai-Lin Yang, K. Nisa'","doi":"10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p261-274","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to investigate mathematics teacher educators’ (MTE) knowledge in noticing preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) on the hierarchical classification of the quadrilateral. A multiple case study was conducted to analyze the responses of ten MTEs in an online moderated-forum group discussion (M-FGD) from their written work on the MTE-PCK test completed prior to the M-FGD. The PCK test consisted of two tasks: the task that examines MTEs’ knowledge to predict pre-service teachers’ reason in representing the hierarchical classification of quadrilateral in Venn diagrams, and the task that examines MTEs’ knowledge in making a flowchart as a recommendation to mathematics teacher to analyze the validity of quadrilateral classification. Results show that the MTEs indicate two considerations of noticing pre-service teachers’ PCK on the quadrilateral classification: by definition and properties of quadrilaterals and by the visual appearance of quadrilaterals. Despite this, 20% of them were indicated to perform a lack of understanding of the hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals, as indicated by invalid flowcharts of validating the hierarchical classification of the quadrilateral.","PeriodicalId":109878,"journal":{"name":"Infinity Journal","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Infinity Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22460/infinity.v12i2.p261-274","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to investigate mathematics teacher educators’ (MTE) knowledge in noticing preservice teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) on the hierarchical classification of the quadrilateral. A multiple case study was conducted to analyze the responses of ten MTEs in an online moderated-forum group discussion (M-FGD) from their written work on the MTE-PCK test completed prior to the M-FGD. The PCK test consisted of two tasks: the task that examines MTEs’ knowledge to predict pre-service teachers’ reason in representing the hierarchical classification of quadrilateral in Venn diagrams, and the task that examines MTEs’ knowledge in making a flowchart as a recommendation to mathematics teacher to analyze the validity of quadrilateral classification. Results show that the MTEs indicate two considerations of noticing pre-service teachers’ PCK on the quadrilateral classification: by definition and properties of quadrilaterals and by the visual appearance of quadrilaterals. Despite this, 20% of them were indicated to perform a lack of understanding of the hierarchical classification of quadrilaterals, as indicated by invalid flowcharts of validating the hierarchical classification of the quadrilateral.
数学教师教育工作者对四边形分层分类教学内容知识的注意
本研究旨在探讨数学教师教育工作者(MTE)对职前教师教学内容知识(PCK)在四边形层次分类上的认知。通过多案例研究,我们分析了10位mte在在线主持论坛小组讨论(M-FGD)中的反应,分析了他们在M-FGD之前完成的MTE-PCK测试的书面作业。PCK测试包括两个任务:一个是考察教师对职前教师在维恩图中表示四边形分层分类的原因的知识,另一个是考察教师对制作流程图作为数学教师推荐的知识,以分析四边形分类的有效性。结果表明,MTEs提示职前教师对四边形分类的PCK注意有两个考虑因素:四边形的定义和性质以及四边形的视觉外观。尽管如此,他们中的20%被指出缺乏对四边形分层分类的理解,正如验证四边形分层分类的无效流程图所表明的那样。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信