“Black Box Justice”: Robot Judges and AI-based Judgment Processes in China’s Court System

Nu Wang
{"title":"“Black Box Justice”: Robot Judges and AI-based Judgment Processes in China’s Court System","authors":"Nu Wang","doi":"10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462216","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been widely adopted in China’s court system to improve work efficiency to better serve the public. This paper evaluates the three stages of how AI is transforming China’s court system: from being a simple auxiliary tool, performing basic tasks through reconciliation of case and trial information; to assisting judges in decision-making by providing recommendations via the AI’s ability to learn from past precedent and standardized evidence review; and finally, to developing into autonomous agents able to take charge of the court and make judgments as robot judges. However, public skepticism around the credibility of the so-called “black box” of AI algorithms in ensuring fair judgment and achieving justice is escalating, with the concern that efficiency does not guarantee effectiveness or ensure public interest. This paper aims to analyze “black box” issues in each stage and demonstrates why China’s effort to pursue AI as an innovative technical practice to realize judicial fairness should take complex social and ethical contexts into consideration. In order to serve for public good in China’s court system, the new technology must ensure its representation of human values and include public participation.","PeriodicalId":196560,"journal":{"name":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ISTAS50296.2020.9462216","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been widely adopted in China’s court system to improve work efficiency to better serve the public. This paper evaluates the three stages of how AI is transforming China’s court system: from being a simple auxiliary tool, performing basic tasks through reconciliation of case and trial information; to assisting judges in decision-making by providing recommendations via the AI’s ability to learn from past precedent and standardized evidence review; and finally, to developing into autonomous agents able to take charge of the court and make judgments as robot judges. However, public skepticism around the credibility of the so-called “black box” of AI algorithms in ensuring fair judgment and achieving justice is escalating, with the concern that efficiency does not guarantee effectiveness or ensure public interest. This paper aims to analyze “black box” issues in each stage and demonstrates why China’s effort to pursue AI as an innovative technical practice to realize judicial fairness should take complex social and ethical contexts into consideration. In order to serve for public good in China’s court system, the new technology must ensure its representation of human values and include public participation.
“黑匣子司法”:中国法院系统中的机器人法官和基于人工智能的审判过程
中国法院系统广泛采用人工智能(AI),以提高工作效率,更好地为公众服务。本文评估了人工智能如何改变中国法院系统的三个阶段:从一个简单的辅助工具,通过协调案件和审判信息来执行基本任务;通过人工智能从过去的先例和标准化的证据审查中学习的能力,提供建议,协助法官做出决策;最后,发展成为自主代理,能够像机器人法官一样掌管法庭并做出判决。然而,公众对人工智能算法在确保公平审判和实现正义方面的所谓“黑箱”可信度的怀疑正在升级,他们担心效率不能保证效果或确保公共利益。本文旨在分析每个阶段的“黑箱”问题,并说明为什么中国将人工智能作为一种创新的技术实践来实现司法公正的努力应该考虑复杂的社会和伦理背景。为了在中国的法院系统中服务于公共利益,新技术必须确保其代表人类价值观并包括公众参与。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信