{"title":"Investment project for implementing a closed water circulation system at an industrial company","authors":"Nadejda G. Vurdova, Y. Yuriev","doi":"10.21285/2227-2917-2022-4-529-538","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Due to the considerable costs involved in industrial wastewater treatment, the introduction of open (low-discharge) and closed water circulation systems is the most sensible way to prevent environmen-tal pollution at industrial companies. Since the level of circulating water treatment can be much lower than that required for discharge into a water body, the installation of closed water circulation systems can achieve both the economic and total effects of environmental protection. Despite the seemingly obvious advantages of this approach, it requires a serious feasibility analysis. The life cycle costs of a construction project can be estimated according to GOST R 58785-2019 Water Quality. Life Cycle Cost Estimation for Efficient Operation of Water Supply and Sanitation Systems and Facilities. However, at the initial (pre-project) stage, the analysis can be based on benchmarks. Large industrial companies make extensive use of foreign estimation methods. The paper presents the results of a feasibility analysis obtained using different methods to justify investments in the reconstruction of wa-ter treatment facilities at an oil refinery.","PeriodicalId":119410,"journal":{"name":"«Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsiyi. Stroyitelstvo. Nedvizhimost»","volume":"54 41","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"«Izvestiya vuzov. Investitsiyi. Stroyitelstvo. Nedvizhimost»","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21285/2227-2917-2022-4-529-538","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Due to the considerable costs involved in industrial wastewater treatment, the introduction of open (low-discharge) and closed water circulation systems is the most sensible way to prevent environmen-tal pollution at industrial companies. Since the level of circulating water treatment can be much lower than that required for discharge into a water body, the installation of closed water circulation systems can achieve both the economic and total effects of environmental protection. Despite the seemingly obvious advantages of this approach, it requires a serious feasibility analysis. The life cycle costs of a construction project can be estimated according to GOST R 58785-2019 Water Quality. Life Cycle Cost Estimation for Efficient Operation of Water Supply and Sanitation Systems and Facilities. However, at the initial (pre-project) stage, the analysis can be based on benchmarks. Large industrial companies make extensive use of foreign estimation methods. The paper presents the results of a feasibility analysis obtained using different methods to justify investments in the reconstruction of wa-ter treatment facilities at an oil refinery.
由于工业废水处理涉及相当大的成本,引入开式(低排放)和闭式水循环系统是工业公司防止环境污染的最明智的方法。由于循环水处理的水平可以远远低于排放到水体中的要求,因此安装闭式水循环系统可以实现经济和环境保护的总体效果。尽管这种方法似乎有明显的优点,但它需要进行认真的可行性分析。建筑项目的生命周期成本可根据GOST R 58785-2019《水质》进行估算。供水和卫生系统及设施有效运行的生命周期成本估算。然而,在初始(项目前)阶段,分析可以基于基准。大型工业公司广泛使用国外的估算方法。本文介绍了采用不同方法对某炼油厂水处理设施改造投资进行可行性分析的结果。