Integration of Mineralogy, Petrophysics, Geochemistry and Geomechanics to Evaluate Unconventional Shale Resources

Gang Hui, F. Gu, Zhangxin Chen
{"title":"Integration of Mineralogy, Petrophysics, Geochemistry and Geomechanics to Evaluate Unconventional Shale Resources","authors":"Gang Hui, F. Gu, Zhangxin Chen","doi":"10.2118/210642-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n It is not entirely understood how related geological parameters vary during the thermal maturation and development of shale resources and controlling factors of shale productivity. Here, a detailed examination of mineralogy, geochemistry, petrophysics, and geomechanics-related data is conducted to explore the productivity of the Fox Creek, Alberta shale play. Experiments using X-Ray Diffraction, Tight Rock Analysis, Rock-Eval Pyrolysis, and Triaxial Compression are conducted to characterize the mineralogy, petrophysics, geochemistry, and geomechanics of the region under study. Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) is used to quantify the relationship between shale output productivity and reservoir input parameters. Using 300 core samples from 15 wells targeting the Duvernay shale, the key governing characteristics of shale potential were then examined. The Duvernay shale is dominated by quartz, clay, and calcite, according to X-Ray Diffraction measurements. Tight Rock Analysis indicates that the effective porosity of the Duvernay shale ranges from 1.56% to 6.11%, with an average value of 3.97 %, while the core permeability ranges from 0.25 to 345.5 nD, with an average value of 127.2nD. The total organic carbon (TOC) content ranged from 2.32 to 5.0 %, with an average of 3.86 %, according to Rock-Eval Pyrolysis testing. The majority of the Duvernay shale near the Fox Creek region (i.e., Fox Creek shale) was deposited in an oxygen-depleted maritime environment, whereas the Duvernay shale was in the gas generation window. The MLR technique determines the elements controlling shale productivity, including the production index, gas saturation, clay content, porosity, total organic carbon, brittleness index, and brittle mineral content as input parameters in decreasing order. Based on the MLR prediction model, the expected 12-month shale gas production per stage corresponds well with the actual value. This strategy can guide the future selection of horizontal well drilling sites and lead to the efficient and profitable development of shale resources.","PeriodicalId":151564,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, October 17, 2022","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, October 17, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/210642-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is not entirely understood how related geological parameters vary during the thermal maturation and development of shale resources and controlling factors of shale productivity. Here, a detailed examination of mineralogy, geochemistry, petrophysics, and geomechanics-related data is conducted to explore the productivity of the Fox Creek, Alberta shale play. Experiments using X-Ray Diffraction, Tight Rock Analysis, Rock-Eval Pyrolysis, and Triaxial Compression are conducted to characterize the mineralogy, petrophysics, geochemistry, and geomechanics of the region under study. Multiple Linear Regression (MLR) is used to quantify the relationship between shale output productivity and reservoir input parameters. Using 300 core samples from 15 wells targeting the Duvernay shale, the key governing characteristics of shale potential were then examined. The Duvernay shale is dominated by quartz, clay, and calcite, according to X-Ray Diffraction measurements. Tight Rock Analysis indicates that the effective porosity of the Duvernay shale ranges from 1.56% to 6.11%, with an average value of 3.97 %, while the core permeability ranges from 0.25 to 345.5 nD, with an average value of 127.2nD. The total organic carbon (TOC) content ranged from 2.32 to 5.0 %, with an average of 3.86 %, according to Rock-Eval Pyrolysis testing. The majority of the Duvernay shale near the Fox Creek region (i.e., Fox Creek shale) was deposited in an oxygen-depleted maritime environment, whereas the Duvernay shale was in the gas generation window. The MLR technique determines the elements controlling shale productivity, including the production index, gas saturation, clay content, porosity, total organic carbon, brittleness index, and brittle mineral content as input parameters in decreasing order. Based on the MLR prediction model, the expected 12-month shale gas production per stage corresponds well with the actual value. This strategy can guide the future selection of horizontal well drilling sites and lead to the efficient and profitable development of shale resources.
结合矿物学、岩石物理学、地球化学和地质力学评价非常规页岩资源
页岩资源热成熟开发过程中相关地质参数的变化规律以及页岩产能的控制因素尚不完全清楚。在这里,对矿物学、地球化学、岩石物理学和地质力学相关数据进行了详细的检查,以探索阿尔伯塔省Fox Creek页岩区的产能。利用x射线衍射、致密岩分析、岩石热解和三轴压缩等实验手段对研究区域的矿物学、岩石物理、地球化学和地质力学进行了表征。采用多元线性回归(MLR)定量分析页岩产能与储层投入参数之间的关系。利用来自Duvernay页岩15口井的300个岩心样本,研究了页岩潜力的关键控制特征。根据x射线衍射测量,Duvernay页岩主要由石英、粘土和方解石组成。致密岩分析表明,Duvernay页岩有效孔隙度范围为1.56% ~ 6.11%,平均值为3.97%;岩心渗透率范围为0.25 ~ 345.5 nD,平均值为127.2。岩石热解测试结果表明,总有机碳(TOC)含量在2.32% ~ 5.0%之间,平均为3.86%。Fox Creek地区附近的大部分Duvernay页岩(即Fox Creek页岩)沉积在缺氧的海洋环境中,而Duvernay页岩则处于生气窗口。MLR技术确定了控制页岩产能的要素,包括生产指数、含气饱和度、粘土含量、孔隙度、总有机碳、脆性指数、脆性矿物含量等输入参数。基于MLR预测模型,预计12个月页岩气每级产量与实际值吻合较好。该策略可指导今后水平井钻井场地的选择,实现页岩资源的高效、效益开发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信