Fatima Iftikhar, M. Tayyab, T. F. Ahmed, Tahira Sadiq
{"title":"A Cross-Sectional Survey On the Psychological Effects of COVID-19 on Doctors and Non-doctors in Pakistan","authors":"Fatima Iftikhar, M. Tayyab, T. F. Ahmed, Tahira Sadiq","doi":"10.33590/emjrespir/21-00159","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic is still showing fluctuating trends and rapidly increasing case numbers, naturally creating a significant air of panic and hopelessness. This study aimed to investigate the mental health status of doctors in comparison to non-doctors, and its suggestive determinants amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.\n\nMethods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted during January–March 2021, using a convenience sampling technique. A sample size of 377 was calculated through RaoSoft (RaoSoft Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA) software. Inventories used are Zung Self-Assessment Anxiety Score (SAS) and Self-Assessment Depression Score (SDS), for the purpose of comparing different groups. The survey was distributed as an online Google form via social media. Results were evaluated by IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0 (Endicott, New York, USA).\n\nResults: A total of 395 participants responded, out of which 10% showed extreme levels of anxiety. Among doctors, 14% had moderate levels of anxiety while 10% of unmarried respondents had extreme self-reported anxiety. Out of non-doctors, 15% showed signs of depression, among which a moderate level of depression was seen in 13% males, and severe depression was seen in 4% of married respondents. Higher depression scores were recorded in non-doctors, while there was no significant difference in anxiety levels of both groups.\n\nConclusion: A significant impact on mental health has been noted in various groups of respondents, with severe depression as well as severe anxiety. This should be alarming enough to instigate authorities to conduct mental health programs to counter this negative impact of COVID-19. Quick interventions and strategies can save countries from a grim future.","PeriodicalId":300382,"journal":{"name":"EMJ Respiratory","volume":"221 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EMJ Respiratory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33590/emjrespir/21-00159","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: The COVID-19 pandemic is still showing fluctuating trends and rapidly increasing case numbers, naturally creating a significant air of panic and hopelessness. This study aimed to investigate the mental health status of doctors in comparison to non-doctors, and its suggestive determinants amidst the COVID-19 pandemic.
Methods: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted during January–March 2021, using a convenience sampling technique. A sample size of 377 was calculated through RaoSoft (RaoSoft Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA) software. Inventories used are Zung Self-Assessment Anxiety Score (SAS) and Self-Assessment Depression Score (SDS), for the purpose of comparing different groups. The survey was distributed as an online Google form via social media. Results were evaluated by IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0 (Endicott, New York, USA).
Results: A total of 395 participants responded, out of which 10% showed extreme levels of anxiety. Among doctors, 14% had moderate levels of anxiety while 10% of unmarried respondents had extreme self-reported anxiety. Out of non-doctors, 15% showed signs of depression, among which a moderate level of depression was seen in 13% males, and severe depression was seen in 4% of married respondents. Higher depression scores were recorded in non-doctors, while there was no significant difference in anxiety levels of both groups.
Conclusion: A significant impact on mental health has been noted in various groups of respondents, with severe depression as well as severe anxiety. This should be alarming enough to instigate authorities to conduct mental health programs to counter this negative impact of COVID-19. Quick interventions and strategies can save countries from a grim future.
目的:新冠肺炎疫情仍呈现波动趋势,病例数快速增加,自然造成了严重的恐慌和绝望气氛。本研究旨在调查在COVID-19大流行期间医生与非医生的心理健康状况,以及其暗含的决定因素。方法:采用便捷抽样技术,于2021年1月至3月进行在线横断面调查。通过RaoSoft (RaoSoft Inc., Seattle, Washington, USA)软件计算样本量377人。量表采用Zung焦虑自评评分(SAS)和抑郁自评评分(SDS)进行组间比较。该调查以在线谷歌形式通过社交媒体发布。结果由IBM Statistical Package for Social Sciences version 26.0 (Endicott, New York, USA)评估。结果:共有395名参与者做出了回应,其中10%的人表现出极度焦虑。在医生中,14%的人有中度焦虑,而10%的未婚受访者自我报告有极度焦虑。在非医生的受访者中,15%的人表现出抑郁的迹象,其中13%的男性患有中度抑郁,4%的已婚受访者患有重度抑郁。非医生组的抑郁得分较高,而两组的焦虑水平没有显著差异。结论:在不同的受访者群体中,严重的抑郁和严重的焦虑都注意到对心理健康的重大影响。这应该足以令人震惊,促使当局开展心理健康项目,以应对COVID-19的这种负面影响。迅速的干预措施和战略可以使国家免于严峻的未来。