The Effect of Piezosurgical Ridge Splitting and Osseodensification on The Primary Stability of The Implant in Narrow Ridge: (Comparative Randomized Controlled Split Mouth Clinical Trial)

Elzahraa Abrahim Elgrany, Ibrahium Mwafey, F. A. Zaid, K. Hassan
{"title":"The Effect of Piezosurgical Ridge Splitting and Osseodensification on The Primary Stability of The Implant in Narrow Ridge: (Comparative Randomized Controlled Split Mouth Clinical Trial)","authors":"Elzahraa Abrahim Elgrany, Ibrahium Mwafey, F. A. Zaid, K. Hassan","doi":"10.21608/aadj.2019.60180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effect of and compare between the piezosurgical ridge splitting and osseodensification in implant primary stability.  Subjects and Methods: 28 implants were divided into two groups. Group I: 14 implants in sites received piezosurgery technique. Group II: 14 implants in sites received osseodensification technique.  Then, all implants were evaluated clinically  for primary stability after implant insertion by Osstell mentor magnetic resonance device and radiographically for peri-implant bone density.  Results: unpaired t-test between the two groups showed moderate statistical significant difference in group  II when compared with group I in both primary stability and bone density  Conclusion:  The primary stability in both piezosurgical ridge splitting and osseodensification techniques is within normal range but in favor of osseodensification technique suggesting that osseodensification enhance the bone density thereby improve the implant primary stability.","PeriodicalId":136230,"journal":{"name":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","volume":"307 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Al-Azhar Assiut Dental Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/aadj.2019.60180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the effect of and compare between the piezosurgical ridge splitting and osseodensification in implant primary stability.  Subjects and Methods: 28 implants were divided into two groups. Group I: 14 implants in sites received piezosurgery technique. Group II: 14 implants in sites received osseodensification technique.  Then, all implants were evaluated clinically  for primary stability after implant insertion by Osstell mentor magnetic resonance device and radiographically for peri-implant bone density.  Results: unpaired t-test between the two groups showed moderate statistical significant difference in group  II when compared with group I in both primary stability and bone density  Conclusion:  The primary stability in both piezosurgical ridge splitting and osseodensification techniques is within normal range but in favor of osseodensification technique suggesting that osseodensification enhance the bone density thereby improve the implant primary stability.
压电牙脊劈裂和骨致密化对窄牙脊种植体初级稳定性的影响(比较随机对照裂口临床试验)
目的:评价骨脊劈裂与骨致密化对种植体初期稳定性的影响并进行比较。对象和方法:28颗种植体分为两组。第一组:14个植入体采用压电手术技术。第二组:14个种植体接受骨密度技术。然后,通过Osstell mentor磁共振设备对所有种植体置入后的初级稳定性进行临床评估,并对种植体周围的骨密度进行影像学评估。结果:两组间的非配对t检验显示,与I组相比,II组的初代稳定性和骨密度均有中等程度的统计学差异。结论:骨外科裂脊技术和骨密度技术的初代稳定性均在正常范围内,但骨密度技术更有利,提示骨密度增强,从而提高种植体的初代稳定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信