Comparative Assessment of Hygiene Behaviour Change and Cost-Effectiveness of Community Health Clubs in Rwanda and Zimbabwe

J. Waterkeyn, Regis Matimati, Andrew Muringaniza, Agrippa Chigono, Amans Ntakarutimana, Joseph Katabarwa, Z. Bigirimana, J. Pantoglou, A. Waterkeyn, S. Cairncross
{"title":"Comparative Assessment of Hygiene Behaviour Change and Cost-Effectiveness of Community Health Clubs in Rwanda and Zimbabwe","authors":"J. Waterkeyn, Regis Matimati, Andrew Muringaniza, Agrippa Chigono, Amans Ntakarutimana, Joseph Katabarwa, Z. Bigirimana, J. Pantoglou, A. Waterkeyn, S. Cairncross","doi":"10.5772/intechopen.89995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two similar Community Health Club (CHC) interventions to achieve hygiene behaviour change and improved family health in Africa took place--one in Zimbabwe implemented by an NGO and the other in Rwanda as part of a Randomized Control Trial. Both interventions achieved high levels of community response, although the Zimbabwe project was more cost-effective, achieving blanket coverage of all households in the area with over 90% compliance in 12 recommended practices at a cost of US$4.5 per beneficiary in 8 months. In Rwanda, the spread of the intervention reached only 58% of the households in the first year costing US$13.13 per beneficiary. By the end of three years, the spread had increased to 80% with over 80% of the 4056CHC Members adopting 10 new practices without any extra cost to the project. Although the Zimbabwe program showed better Value for Money, being more efficient, long term sustainability to prevent slippage of hygiene behaviour change depends on a strong monitoring system. Scaling up hygiene behaviour change is best achieved systematically by building the capacity of the Environmental Health Department to take responsibility for the supervision of CHCs in every village. Investing in an integrated national program, which can enable Government to coordinate NGO efforts, is a more cost-effective use of scarce resources in the long term.","PeriodicalId":431497,"journal":{"name":"Healthcare Access - Regional Overviews [Working Title]","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Healthcare Access - Regional Overviews [Working Title]","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.89995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Two similar Community Health Club (CHC) interventions to achieve hygiene behaviour change and improved family health in Africa took place--one in Zimbabwe implemented by an NGO and the other in Rwanda as part of a Randomized Control Trial. Both interventions achieved high levels of community response, although the Zimbabwe project was more cost-effective, achieving blanket coverage of all households in the area with over 90% compliance in 12 recommended practices at a cost of US$4.5 per beneficiary in 8 months. In Rwanda, the spread of the intervention reached only 58% of the households in the first year costing US$13.13 per beneficiary. By the end of three years, the spread had increased to 80% with over 80% of the 4056CHC Members adopting 10 new practices without any extra cost to the project. Although the Zimbabwe program showed better Value for Money, being more efficient, long term sustainability to prevent slippage of hygiene behaviour change depends on a strong monitoring system. Scaling up hygiene behaviour change is best achieved systematically by building the capacity of the Environmental Health Department to take responsibility for the supervision of CHCs in every village. Investing in an integrated national program, which can enable Government to coordinate NGO efforts, is a more cost-effective use of scarce resources in the long term.
卢旺达和津巴布韦社区健康俱乐部卫生行为改变和成本效益的比较评估
在非洲进行了两项类似的社区健康俱乐部(CHC)干预措施,以实现卫生行为的改变和改善家庭健康——一项在津巴布韦由一家非政府组织实施,另一项在卢旺达作为随机对照试验的一部分实施。这两项干预措施都取得了高水平的社区反应,尽管津巴布韦项目更具成本效益,在8个月内实现了对该地区所有家庭的全面覆盖,12项推荐做法的符合率超过90%,每位受益人的成本为4.5美元。在卢旺达,干预措施的普及在第一年仅惠及58%的家庭,每位受益人的费用为13.13美元。到三年后,这一比例增加到80%,4056名chc成员中超过80%的人采用了10种新的实践,而没有给项目带来任何额外的成本。尽管津巴布韦的项目显示出更好的物有所值,但要想更有效、更长期地防止卫生行为改变的滑落,取决于一个强有力的监测系统。要有系统地扩大卫生行为的改变,最好是建立环境卫生司的能力,使其负责监督每个村庄的保健中心。投资于一项综合国家方案,使政府能够协调非政府组织的努力,从长远来看是利用稀缺资源的一种更具成本效益的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信