Graph partitioning with the Party library: helpful-sets in practice

B. Monien, Stefan Schamberger
{"title":"Graph partitioning with the Party library: helpful-sets in practice","authors":"B. Monien, Stefan Schamberger","doi":"10.1109/CAHPC.2004.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Graph partitioning is an important subproblem in many applications. To partition a graph into more than two parts, there exist two different commonly used approaches: Either the graph is partitioned directly into the desired amount of partitions or the graph is first split into two partitions that are then further divided recursively. It has been shown that even optimal recursive bisection can lead to solutions \"very far from the optimal one\". However, for \"important graph classes\" recursive bisection solutions are known to be \"almost always\" within a constant factor of the optimal one. Thus, the question arises how good recursive bisection performs in practice. In this paper we describe enhancements to the Party graph partitioning library which is based on the helpful-set bisection heuristic and present results of extensive tests undertaken with it. We thereby compare Party with the two state-of-the art libraries Metis and Jostle using a permutation based evaluation scheme. We show experimentally that there are indeed many cases where a recursive application of a good bisection heuristic is likely to find better solutions than up-to-date direct approaches.","PeriodicalId":375288,"journal":{"name":"16th Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing","volume":"65 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"16th Symposium on Computer Architecture and High Performance Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CAHPC.2004.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Graph partitioning is an important subproblem in many applications. To partition a graph into more than two parts, there exist two different commonly used approaches: Either the graph is partitioned directly into the desired amount of partitions or the graph is first split into two partitions that are then further divided recursively. It has been shown that even optimal recursive bisection can lead to solutions "very far from the optimal one". However, for "important graph classes" recursive bisection solutions are known to be "almost always" within a constant factor of the optimal one. Thus, the question arises how good recursive bisection performs in practice. In this paper we describe enhancements to the Party graph partitioning library which is based on the helpful-set bisection heuristic and present results of extensive tests undertaken with it. We thereby compare Party with the two state-of-the art libraries Metis and Jostle using a permutation based evaluation scheme. We show experimentally that there are indeed many cases where a recursive application of a good bisection heuristic is likely to find better solutions than up-to-date direct approaches.
使用Party库进行图划分:实践中的有用集
图划分是许多应用中一个重要的子问题。要将图划分为两个以上的部分,有两种不同的常用方法:要么直接将图划分为所需数量的分区,要么首先将图划分为两个分区,然后再递归地进一步划分。结果表明,即使是最优的递归二分也会导致“离最优解很远”的解。然而,对于“重要的图类”,已知递归对分解“几乎总是”在最优解的常数因子内。因此,问题就出现了,递归平分在实践中有多好。在本文中,我们描述了对基于帮助集平分启发式的党图划分库的增强,并给出了使用它进行的广泛测试的结果。因此,我们使用基于排列的评估方案将Party与两个最先进的图书馆Metis和Jostle进行比较。我们通过实验证明,确实有很多情况下,一个好的平分启发式的递归应用可能比最新的直接方法找到更好的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信