{"title":"Aquinas’ Balancing Act","authors":"Gyula Klima","doi":"10.1075/BPJAM.00022.KLI","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nIn this paper, I will primarily argue for the consistency of Aquinas’ conception, according to which the human\nsoul, uniquely in God’s creation, is both the inherent, material, substantial form of the human body, and the subsistent\nimmaterial substance underlying the immaterial operations of its immaterial, rational powers, namely, intellect and will. In this\ndiscussion, I will point out that typical challenges to Aquinas’ conception usually rely on semantic or ontological assumptions\nthat can plausibly be denied in Aquinas’ own conceptual framework. Since the issue of consistency merely assumes the less than\nself-evident claim of the immateriality of the human intellect, I will also provide a brief sketch of what I take to be Aquinas’\nmost promising proof of this claim.","PeriodicalId":165187,"journal":{"name":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","volume":"29 1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bochumer Philosophisches Jahrbuch für Antike und Mittelalter","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/BPJAM.00022.KLI","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
In this paper, I will primarily argue for the consistency of Aquinas’ conception, according to which the human
soul, uniquely in God’s creation, is both the inherent, material, substantial form of the human body, and the subsistent
immaterial substance underlying the immaterial operations of its immaterial, rational powers, namely, intellect and will. In this
discussion, I will point out that typical challenges to Aquinas’ conception usually rely on semantic or ontological assumptions
that can plausibly be denied in Aquinas’ own conceptual framework. Since the issue of consistency merely assumes the less than
self-evident claim of the immateriality of the human intellect, I will also provide a brief sketch of what I take to be Aquinas’
most promising proof of this claim.