Success rate of the Hall technique and the conventional method in the treatment of class II carious lesions on primary molars

M. Georgieva-Dimitrova
{"title":"Success rate of the Hall technique and the conventional method in the treatment of class II carious lesions on primary molars","authors":"M. Georgieva-Dimitrova","doi":"10.14748/SSMD.V5I2.5910","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: Some of the filling materials are extremely ineffective cases of secondary caries as they leave the tooth surface unprotected against cariogenic conditions in the oral cavity. A new approach for treatment of primary molars with preformed metal crowns (PMCs) is implemented known as Hall Technique. PMCs provide excellent sealing in primary molars arresting the progression of the carious process. AIM: The aim of this article is to do a comparative assessment of the received results when restoring approximal dentin carious lesions with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and Hall crowns in primary and early mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a 2-year period object of clinical observation were 100 teeth with approximal dentin carious lesions on primary molars in children at 5-7 years of age from Varna. Fifty of them were restored with GIC, and the other 50 were sealed with PMCs using the Hall technique. The progression of the carious lesion and the failure of the restoration were examined. RESULT: The major failures with the Hall technique after 2-year follow-up accounted for only 2%, and the minor ones were 4%. For the conventional methods with GIC as filling material, they were 12% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The average duration of PMCs restorations using the Hall technique is very high. They may be an appropriate option for restoration and treatment of the carious process on primary molars, especially for class II carious lesions. After the follow-up period we can conclude that the Hall technique has advantage over the conventional methods of treatment with GICs.","PeriodicalId":303832,"journal":{"name":"Scripta Scientifica Medicinae Dentalis","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scripta Scientifica Medicinae Dentalis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14748/SSMD.V5I2.5910","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Some of the filling materials are extremely ineffective cases of secondary caries as they leave the tooth surface unprotected against cariogenic conditions in the oral cavity. A new approach for treatment of primary molars with preformed metal crowns (PMCs) is implemented known as Hall Technique. PMCs provide excellent sealing in primary molars arresting the progression of the carious process. AIM: The aim of this article is to do a comparative assessment of the received results when restoring approximal dentin carious lesions with glass ionomer cement (GIC) and Hall crowns in primary and early mixed dentition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For a 2-year period object of clinical observation were 100 teeth with approximal dentin carious lesions on primary molars in children at 5-7 years of age from Varna. Fifty of them were restored with GIC, and the other 50 were sealed with PMCs using the Hall technique. The progression of the carious lesion and the failure of the restoration were examined. RESULT: The major failures with the Hall technique after 2-year follow-up accounted for only 2%, and the minor ones were 4%. For the conventional methods with GIC as filling material, they were 12% and 48%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The average duration of PMCs restorations using the Hall technique is very high. They may be an appropriate option for restoration and treatment of the carious process on primary molars, especially for class II carious lesions. After the follow-up period we can conclude that the Hall technique has advantage over the conventional methods of treatment with GICs.
霍尔技术与常规方法治疗初级磨牙II类龋齿的成功率比较
导言:有些填充物对继发性龋齿非常无效,因为它们使牙齿表面不受口腔内致龋条件的保护。采用预制金属冠(PMCs)治疗初生磨牙的新方法被称为霍尔技术。pmc在第一磨牙中提供了良好的密封,阻止了龋病的发展。目的:比较玻璃离子水门栓(GIC)和霍尔冠在初级牙列和早期混合牙列修复牙本质近似龋损的效果。材料与方法:对瓦尔纳地区5 ~ 7岁的100颗初生磨牙牙本质近似龋病患儿进行为期2年的临床观察。其中50例用GIC修复,另外50例用Hall技术用pmc密封。检查了龋齿的进展情况和修复失败情况。结果:随访2年后,Hall技术主要失败率仅为2%,次要失败率为4%。以GIC为充填材料的常规方法,分别为12%和48%。结论:采用Hall技术修复PMCs的平均持续时间较高。它们可能是修复和治疗初级磨牙龋齿过程的合适选择,特别是对于II级龋齿病变。在随访期后,我们可以得出结论,霍尔技术比传统的治疗方法更有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信