Computed Tomography Wall Thickness Inspection to Support Gas Turbine Blade Life Extension

Scott Hastie, A. Chan, K. Wiens, D. Nagy, R. Tollett, P. Lowden
{"title":"Computed Tomography Wall Thickness Inspection to Support Gas Turbine Blade Life Extension","authors":"Scott Hastie, A. Chan, K. Wiens, D. Nagy, R. Tollett, P. Lowden","doi":"10.1115/gt2021-60316","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The inclusion of Full Solution Rejuvenation (FSR®) in repairs of flight and aero-derivative gas turbine blades has shifted the primary cause for blade retirement from creep life consumption which is a function of service hours to primarily geometric limitations that are more governed by the cumulative number of repair cycles. For internally cooled components, one of the most significant causes for rejection is the remaining wall thickness of the airfoil. Operating blades with under-sized wall thickness can reduce the load-bearing capability and can increase the stresses that develop under transient thermal conditions found in operation.\n Typically, ultrasonic wall thickness measurement techniques are used during repair processing for determining remaining wall thickness on components but a number of limitations to obtaining accurate results with this process have been identified. Computed Tomography (CT) wall thickness inspection has addressed these limitations and become an important tool for extending the life of components beyond the typical OEM limits during repair.\n Entirely from the CT equipment user’s perspective, this paper explores a number of technical findings in the development of a highly accurate CT wall thickness inspection process for flight and aero-derivative gas turbine blades for utilization during repair after one or more service intervals. The importance of the accuracy of these wall thickness measurements is to ensure undersized blades are rejected and blades above the minimum wall thickness are accepted. Reducing uncertainty in the wall thickness measurements allows reconsideration of the acceptance limit and can result in more repairable blades returned for full service intervals. The target accuracy for measurements process was .002”. The findings described include aspects of equipment configuration, process parameters for the initial CT scanning, post-processing and interpretation, results validation specific to the component being measured and process limitations encountered.","PeriodicalId":286637,"journal":{"name":"Volume 7: Industrial and Cogeneration; Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 7: Industrial and Cogeneration; Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/gt2021-60316","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The inclusion of Full Solution Rejuvenation (FSR®) in repairs of flight and aero-derivative gas turbine blades has shifted the primary cause for blade retirement from creep life consumption which is a function of service hours to primarily geometric limitations that are more governed by the cumulative number of repair cycles. For internally cooled components, one of the most significant causes for rejection is the remaining wall thickness of the airfoil. Operating blades with under-sized wall thickness can reduce the load-bearing capability and can increase the stresses that develop under transient thermal conditions found in operation. Typically, ultrasonic wall thickness measurement techniques are used during repair processing for determining remaining wall thickness on components but a number of limitations to obtaining accurate results with this process have been identified. Computed Tomography (CT) wall thickness inspection has addressed these limitations and become an important tool for extending the life of components beyond the typical OEM limits during repair. Entirely from the CT equipment user’s perspective, this paper explores a number of technical findings in the development of a highly accurate CT wall thickness inspection process for flight and aero-derivative gas turbine blades for utilization during repair after one or more service intervals. The importance of the accuracy of these wall thickness measurements is to ensure undersized blades are rejected and blades above the minimum wall thickness are accepted. Reducing uncertainty in the wall thickness measurements allows reconsideration of the acceptance limit and can result in more repairable blades returned for full service intervals. The target accuracy for measurements process was .002”. The findings described include aspects of equipment configuration, process parameters for the initial CT scanning, post-processing and interpretation, results validation specific to the component being measured and process limitations encountered.
计算机断层扫描壁厚检测支持燃气轮机叶片寿命延长
在飞行和航空衍生燃气轮机叶片的维修中包含全溶液再生(FSR®),已经将叶片退役的主要原因从蠕变寿命消耗(是服务时间的函数)转移到主要的几何限制(更多地受累积维修周期数量的控制)。对于内部冷却的组件,一个最重要的原因拒绝是翼型的剩余壁厚。如果叶片壁厚过薄,会降低叶片的承载能力,并增加叶片在瞬态热条件下产生的应力。通常,在修复过程中使用超声波壁厚测量技术来确定部件的剩余壁厚,但是已经确定了使用该过程获得准确结果的许多限制。计算机断层扫描(CT)壁厚检测解决了这些限制,并成为延长部件寿命的重要工具,超出了典型的OEM修复限制。本文完全从CT设备用户的角度出发,探讨了在开发飞行和航空衍生燃气轮机叶片高精度CT壁厚检测过程中的一些技术发现,以便在一次或多次维修间隔后的维修期间使用。这些壁厚测量的准确性的重要性是确保尺寸过小的叶片被拒绝,而超过最小壁厚的叶片被接受。减少壁厚测量的不确定性,可以重新考虑可接受限度,并可以在整个维修周期内返回更多可修复的叶片。测量过程的目标精度为0.002”。所描述的结果包括设备配置、初始CT扫描的工艺参数、后处理和解释、特定于被测量组件的结果验证以及遇到的工艺限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信