What I Seek to Show

Andrew Smithers
{"title":"What I Seek to Show","authors":"Andrew Smithers","doi":"10.1093/OSO/9780198836117.003.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter previews the argument set out in the book. A change in economic policy is essential to prevent a fall in living standards in the UK and the US. Weak growth was the result of changes in demography and productivity, caused by the fall in the birth rate in the 1960s and in investment after the 1980s. We cannot change demography so we must increase investment. Conventional growth theory needs to be revised. Current consensus Total Factor Productivity Models are untestable and thus unscientific. This chapter proposes a revised model which is testable and robust when tested. This shows growth does not just depend on technological advance as it can be boosted by policies that encourage more tangible investment. The distractions that have led to a lack of debate over this are examined and policy measures to revive investment and growth are proposed.","PeriodicalId":134328,"journal":{"name":"Productivity and the Bonus Culture","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Productivity and the Bonus Culture","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OSO/9780198836117.003.0002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This chapter previews the argument set out in the book. A change in economic policy is essential to prevent a fall in living standards in the UK and the US. Weak growth was the result of changes in demography and productivity, caused by the fall in the birth rate in the 1960s and in investment after the 1980s. We cannot change demography so we must increase investment. Conventional growth theory needs to be revised. Current consensus Total Factor Productivity Models are untestable and thus unscientific. This chapter proposes a revised model which is testable and robust when tested. This shows growth does not just depend on technological advance as it can be boosted by policies that encourage more tangible investment. The distractions that have led to a lack of debate over this are examined and policy measures to revive investment and growth are proposed.
我想要展示的
这一章概述了书中提出的论点。经济政策的改变对于防止英美两国生活水平的下降至关重要。经济增长疲软是人口结构和生产率变化的结果,这是由20世纪60年代出生率下降和80年代以后投资下降造成的。我们不能改变人口结构,所以我们必须增加投资。传统的增长理论需要修正。目前共识的全要素生产率模型是不可检验的,因此不科学。本章提出了一个修正后的模型,该模型经过测试后具有可测试性和鲁棒性。这表明增长并不仅仅依赖于技术进步,因为鼓励更多有形投资的政策也可以促进增长。本文分析了导致对此缺乏讨论的干扰因素,并提出了恢复投资和增长的政策措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信